All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	"Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: "Tom Rini" <trini@konsulko.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mtd: allow getting MTD device associated with a specific DT node
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:49:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22ce9497-563f-0855-bec2-c56d4ddcfffa@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220611204651.19947-1-zajec5@gmail.com>

Hello Rafał,

On 11.06.22 22:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> MTD subsystem API allows interacting with MTD devices (e.g. reading,
> writing, handling bad blocks). So far a random driver could get MTD
> device only by its name (get_mtd_device_nm()). This change allows
> getting them also by a DT node.
> 
> This API is required for drivers handling DT defined MTD partitions in a
> specific way (e.g. U-Boot (sub)partition with environment variables).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> V3: First introduction of of_get_mtd_device_by_node()
> 
> mtd maintainers: please let know how would you like this patch
> processed. Would that be OK for you to Review/Ack it and let it go
> through NVMEM tree?
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 9eb0680db312..7dc214271c85 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,34 @@ int __get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_mtd_device);
>  
> +/**
> + * of_get_mtd_device_by_node - obtain an MTD device associated with a given node
> + *
> + * @np: device tree node
> + */
> +struct mtd_info *of_get_mtd_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct mtd_info *mtd = NULL;
> +	struct mtd_info *tmp;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> +
> +	err = -ENODEV;

Shouldn't this be -EPROBE_DEFER? That way drivers making
use of this function can defer probe until the device
is probed.

> +	mtd_for_each_device(tmp) {
> +		if (mtd_get_of_node(tmp) == np) {
> +			mtd = tmp;
> +			err = __get_mtd_device(mtd);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> +
> +	return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : mtd;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_get_mtd_device_by_node);
> +
>  /**
>   *	get_mtd_device_nm - obtain a validated handle for an MTD device by
>   *	device name
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index 955aee14b0f7..6fc841ceef31 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -677,6 +677,7 @@ extern int mtd_device_unregister(struct mtd_info *master);
>  extern struct mtd_info *get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int num);
>  extern int __get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  extern void __put_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
> +extern struct mtd_info *of_get_mtd_device_by_node(struct device_node *np);
>  extern struct mtd_info *get_mtd_device_nm(const char *name);
>  extern void put_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	"Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: "Tom Rini" <trini@konsulko.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mtd: allow getting MTD device associated with a specific DT node
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:49:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22ce9497-563f-0855-bec2-c56d4ddcfffa@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220611204651.19947-1-zajec5@gmail.com>

Hello Rafał,

On 11.06.22 22:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> MTD subsystem API allows interacting with MTD devices (e.g. reading,
> writing, handling bad blocks). So far a random driver could get MTD
> device only by its name (get_mtd_device_nm()). This change allows
> getting them also by a DT node.
> 
> This API is required for drivers handling DT defined MTD partitions in a
> specific way (e.g. U-Boot (sub)partition with environment variables).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> V3: First introduction of of_get_mtd_device_by_node()
> 
> mtd maintainers: please let know how would you like this patch
> processed. Would that be OK for you to Review/Ack it and let it go
> through NVMEM tree?
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 9eb0680db312..7dc214271c85 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,34 @@ int __get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_mtd_device);
>  
> +/**
> + * of_get_mtd_device_by_node - obtain an MTD device associated with a given node
> + *
> + * @np: device tree node
> + */
> +struct mtd_info *of_get_mtd_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct mtd_info *mtd = NULL;
> +	struct mtd_info *tmp;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> +
> +	err = -ENODEV;

Shouldn't this be -EPROBE_DEFER? That way drivers making
use of this function can defer probe until the device
is probed.

> +	mtd_for_each_device(tmp) {
> +		if (mtd_get_of_node(tmp) == np) {
> +			mtd = tmp;
> +			err = __get_mtd_device(mtd);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> +
> +	return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : mtd;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_get_mtd_device_by_node);
> +
>  /**
>   *	get_mtd_device_nm - obtain a validated handle for an MTD device by
>   *	device name
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index 955aee14b0f7..6fc841ceef31 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -677,6 +677,7 @@ extern int mtd_device_unregister(struct mtd_info *master);
>  extern struct mtd_info *get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int num);
>  extern int __get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  extern void __put_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
> +extern struct mtd_info *of_get_mtd_device_by_node(struct device_node *np);
>  extern struct mtd_info *get_mtd_device_nm(const char *name);
>  extern void put_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	"Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: "Tom Rini" <trini@konsulko.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mtd: allow getting MTD device associated with a specific DT node
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:49:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22ce9497-563f-0855-bec2-c56d4ddcfffa@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220611204651.19947-1-zajec5@gmail.com>

Hello Rafał,

On 11.06.22 22:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> MTD subsystem API allows interacting with MTD devices (e.g. reading,
> writing, handling bad blocks). So far a random driver could get MTD
> device only by its name (get_mtd_device_nm()). This change allows
> getting them also by a DT node.
> 
> This API is required for drivers handling DT defined MTD partitions in a
> specific way (e.g. U-Boot (sub)partition with environment variables).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> V3: First introduction of of_get_mtd_device_by_node()
> 
> mtd maintainers: please let know how would you like this patch
> processed. Would that be OK for you to Review/Ack it and let it go
> through NVMEM tree?
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 9eb0680db312..7dc214271c85 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,34 @@ int __get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_mtd_device);
>  
> +/**
> + * of_get_mtd_device_by_node - obtain an MTD device associated with a given node
> + *
> + * @np: device tree node
> + */
> +struct mtd_info *of_get_mtd_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct mtd_info *mtd = NULL;
> +	struct mtd_info *tmp;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> +
> +	err = -ENODEV;

Shouldn't this be -EPROBE_DEFER? That way drivers making
use of this function can defer probe until the device
is probed.

> +	mtd_for_each_device(tmp) {
> +		if (mtd_get_of_node(tmp) == np) {
> +			mtd = tmp;
> +			err = __get_mtd_device(mtd);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> +
> +	return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : mtd;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_get_mtd_device_by_node);
> +
>  /**
>   *	get_mtd_device_nm - obtain a validated handle for an MTD device by
>   *	device name
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index 955aee14b0f7..6fc841ceef31 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -677,6 +677,7 @@ extern int mtd_device_unregister(struct mtd_info *master);
>  extern struct mtd_info *get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int num);
>  extern int __get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  extern void __put_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
> +extern struct mtd_info *of_get_mtd_device_by_node(struct device_node *np);
>  extern struct mtd_info *get_mtd_device_nm(const char *name);
>  extern void put_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-14  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-11 20:46 [PATCH V3 1/2] mtd: allow getting MTD device associated with a specific DT node Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-11 20:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-11 20:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-11 20:46 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] nvmem: add driver handling U-Boot environment variables Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-11 20:46   ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-11 20:46   ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-14  6:45   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-06-14  6:45     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-06-14  6:45     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-06-15 18:30     ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-15 18:30       ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-15 18:30       ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-14  7:46   ` Sascha Hauer
2022-06-14  7:46     ` Sascha Hauer
2022-06-14  7:46     ` Sascha Hauer
2022-06-14  9:02     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-14  9:02       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-14  9:02       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-13 14:04 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] mtd: allow getting MTD device associated with a specific DT node Miquel Raynal
2022-06-13 14:04   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-13 14:04   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-13 14:15   ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-13 14:15     ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-13 14:15     ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-06-13 14:33     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-13 14:33       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-13 14:33       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-14  6:49 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2022-06-14  6:49   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-06-14  6:49   ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22ce9497-563f-0855-bec2-c56d4ddcfffa@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.