From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:47:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2343401.BLEA8Ff99T@amdc1976> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgQYxkHr5fvR0Ju67mWoYuGsqc2eNt2vmVXYxbf-WmOWvg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:42:19 AM Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi AlL,
>
>
> On 8 May 2015 at 16:37, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Addition of CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to support Exynos5420 cpu clk so that
> > correct divider values are re-calculated after both pre/post
> > clock notifiers had run for mout_apll clock and mout_kpll clock.
> >
> > Observation their is considerable improvement in cpufreq stats
> > after applying this patch.
> >
> > Governer : "performance"
> > $ cpupower -c 1 frequency-info
> >
> > Below is table format of the output.
> > cpufreq stats: Frequency| Before | After |
> > CPU 1
> > 200 MHz | 22.07% | 46.57% |
> > 300 MHz | 1.08% | 8.18% |
> > 400 MHz | 0.17% | 1.93% |
> > 500 MHz | 0.24% | 3.51% |
> > 600 MHz | 0.37% | 2.13% |
> > 700 MHz | 0.20% | 0.88% |
> > 800 MHz | 0.09% | 1.69% |
> > 900 MHz | 0.05% | 1.02% |
> > 1000 MHz | 0.02% | 2.55% |
> > 1.10 GHz | 0.12% | 1.17% |
> > 1.20 GHz | 0.05% | 0.88% |
> > 1.30 GHz | 0.07% | 0.38% |
> > 1.40 GHz | 0.04% | 0.38% |
> > 1.50 GHz | 0.02% | 0.00% |
> > 1.60 GHz | 0.00% | 0.15% |
> > 1.70 GHz | 0.00% | 0.44% |
> > 1.80 GHz | 75.43% | 28.26% |
> >
> > Governer : "performance"
> > $ cpupower -c 0 frequency-info
> >
> > Below is table format of the output.
> > cpufreq stats: Frequency| Before | After |
> > CPU0 200 MHz | 33.95% | 60.31% |
> > 300 MHz | 4.64% | 2.13% |
> > 400 MHz | 1.50% | 0.79% |
> > 500 MHz | 1.46% | 0.49% |
> > 600 MHz | 0.05% | 0.27% |
> > 700 MHz | 0.68% | 0.21% |
> > 800 MHz | 0.08% | 0.19% |
> > 900 MHz | 0.09% | 0.12% |
> > 1000 MHz | 0.20% | 0.10% |
> > 1.10 GHz | 0.21% | 0.11%, |
> > 1.20 GHz | 0.51% | 0.28%, |
> > 1.30 GHz | 56.64% | 35.01% |
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > index 462aaee..6c7458c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > @@ -618,10 +618,10 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
> > MUX(0, "mout_mspll_cpu", mout_mspll_cpu_p, SRC_TOP7, 12, 2),
> >
> > MUX_F(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
> > - CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> > + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES, 0),
> > MUX(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
> > MUX_F(0, "mout_kpll", mout_kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1,
> > - CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> > + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES, 0),
> > MUX(0, "mout_kfc", mout_kfc_p, SRC_KFC, 16, 1),
> >
> > MUX(0, "mout_aclk200", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 8, 2),
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
>
> Any comments on this patch.
Thanks for catching and fixing this.
I'll integrate your fix into Exynos542x/5800 cpufreq patchset
once I get to updating it (there were comments WRT arm_big_little
cpufreq driver changes). Please also note that it may take some
time as I still need to update Exynos4x12 patch series first
(Viresh has requested porting it over opp-v2 changes).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b.zolnierkie@samsung.com (Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:47:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2343401.BLEA8Ff99T@amdc1976> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgQYxkHr5fvR0Ju67mWoYuGsqc2eNt2vmVXYxbf-WmOWvg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:42:19 AM Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi AlL,
>
>
> On 8 May 2015 at 16:37, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Addition of CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to support Exynos5420 cpu clk so that
> > correct divider values are re-calculated after both pre/post
> > clock notifiers had run for mout_apll clock and mout_kpll clock.
> >
> > Observation their is considerable improvement in cpufreq stats
> > after applying this patch.
> >
> > Governer : "performance"
> > $ cpupower -c 1 frequency-info
> >
> > Below is table format of the output.
> > cpufreq stats: Frequency| Before | After |
> > CPU 1
> > 200 MHz | 22.07% | 46.57% |
> > 300 MHz | 1.08% | 8.18% |
> > 400 MHz | 0.17% | 1.93% |
> > 500 MHz | 0.24% | 3.51% |
> > 600 MHz | 0.37% | 2.13% |
> > 700 MHz | 0.20% | 0.88% |
> > 800 MHz | 0.09% | 1.69% |
> > 900 MHz | 0.05% | 1.02% |
> > 1000 MHz | 0.02% | 2.55% |
> > 1.10 GHz | 0.12% | 1.17% |
> > 1.20 GHz | 0.05% | 0.88% |
> > 1.30 GHz | 0.07% | 0.38% |
> > 1.40 GHz | 0.04% | 0.38% |
> > 1.50 GHz | 0.02% | 0.00% |
> > 1.60 GHz | 0.00% | 0.15% |
> > 1.70 GHz | 0.00% | 0.44% |
> > 1.80 GHz | 75.43% | 28.26% |
> >
> > Governer : "performance"
> > $ cpupower -c 0 frequency-info
> >
> > Below is table format of the output.
> > cpufreq stats: Frequency| Before | After |
> > CPU0 200 MHz | 33.95% | 60.31% |
> > 300 MHz | 4.64% | 2.13% |
> > 400 MHz | 1.50% | 0.79% |
> > 500 MHz | 1.46% | 0.49% |
> > 600 MHz | 0.05% | 0.27% |
> > 700 MHz | 0.68% | 0.21% |
> > 800 MHz | 0.08% | 0.19% |
> > 900 MHz | 0.09% | 0.12% |
> > 1000 MHz | 0.20% | 0.10% |
> > 1.10 GHz | 0.21% | 0.11%, |
> > 1.20 GHz | 0.51% | 0.28%, |
> > 1.30 GHz | 56.64% | 35.01% |
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > index 462aaee..6c7458c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > @@ -618,10 +618,10 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
> > MUX(0, "mout_mspll_cpu", mout_mspll_cpu_p, SRC_TOP7, 12, 2),
> >
> > MUX_F(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
> > - CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> > + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES, 0),
> > MUX(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
> > MUX_F(0, "mout_kpll", mout_kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1,
> > - CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> > + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES, 0),
> > MUX(0, "mout_kfc", mout_kfc_p, SRC_KFC, 16, 1),
> >
> > MUX(0, "mout_aclk200", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 8, 2),
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
>
> Any comments on this patch.
Thanks for catching and fixing this.
I'll integrate your fix into Exynos542x/5800 cpufreq patchset
once I get to updating it (there were comments WRT arm_big_little
cpufreq driver changes). Please also note that it may take some
time as I still need to update Exynos4x12 patch series first
(Viresh has requested porting it over opp-v2 changes).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-01 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 11:07 [PATCHv3] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout_kpll clock Anand Moon
2015-05-08 11:07 ` Anand Moon
2015-07-01 6:12 ` Anand Moon
2015-07-01 6:12 ` Anand Moon
2015-07-01 13:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2015-07-01 13:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2343401.BLEA8Ff99T@amdc1976 \
--to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.