From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:04:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23552.1173395045@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081350510.25051@potato.cts.ucla.edu>
Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu> wrote:
>It's active-backup. Testing with the same setup and e100 works fine. I've
>done a few tests without the bonding module, using the dual-port
>separately.
Somebody else a couple of weeks ago was having similar issues
running bonding with skge (in 802.3ad mode, in his case) that also
vanished with different hardware. I don't have any skge hardware, so I
can't test it here. His problem was a failure in 802.3ad negotiation,
not a system lockup, though.
If you're running active-backup and not using the ARP monitor
(arp_interval), then I'm not aware of any possible locking problems in
bonding for the kernel version you reference (2.6.20.1).
>1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2 <-- eth2 is no longer responsive
> ip link set mtu 1500 eth2 <-- eth2 remains unresponsive
>
>2) ifup eth2
> ifdown eth2
>
> perl -pi -e 's/eth2/eth3/' /etc/network/interfaces
>
> ifup eth3 <-- locks up here
This would seem to suggest a problem with skge itself, although
there might be some other interaction with bonding that causes the
problems for that case.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 19:20 skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 21:31 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 22:23 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 23:04 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2007-03-08 23:13 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:09 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:16 ` [PATCH] skge: set mac address bonding fix Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-12 22:39 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 23:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-13 0:37 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-15 14:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 22:28 ` skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-05-09 0:06 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:37 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23552.1173395045@death \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cbs@cts.ucla.edu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.