From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:37:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9975.1173389861@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081101390.21717@potato.cts.ucla.edu>
Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu> wrote:
>Within 2 or 3 minutes after issuing
>
>ip link set bond1 mtu 9000
>
>I get one "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth2: transmit timed out" to the console, and
>then this starts to repeat:
>
>BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
I believe this is the same bug that is fixed by this change:
commit c4f283b1f275e5528c13c119e5cfc80cdba55d00
Author: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Feb 28 17:03:20 2007 -0800
bonding: fix double dev_add_pack
Bonding can erroneously register the same packet_type to receive
ARPs (for use by ARP validation): once at device open time, and once via
sysfs. Since sysfs can change the validate setting (and thus register
or unregister) at any time, a flag is needed to synchronize with device
open in order to avoid double registrations, and the simplest place is
within the packet_type structure itself. Double unregister is not an
issue.
Bug reported by Ulrich Oelmann <ulrich.oelmann@web.de>.
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index ea73ebf..68afcb5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3423,6 +3423,9 @@ void bond_register_arp(struct bonding *b
{
struct packet_type *pt = &bond->arp_mon_pt;
+ if (pt->type)
+ return;
+
pt->type = htons(ETH_P_ARP);
pt->dev = NULL; /*bond->dev;XXX*/
pt->func = bond_arp_rcv;
@@ -3431,7 +3434,10 @@ void bond_register_arp(struct bonding *b
void bond_unregister_arp(struct bonding *bond)
{
- dev_remove_pack(&bond->arp_mon_pt);
+ struct packet_type *pt = &bond->arp_mon_pt;
+
+ dev_remove_pack(pt);
+ pt->type = 0;
}
/*---------------------------- Hashing Policies -----------------------------*/
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 19:20 skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 21:31 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 22:23 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 23:04 ` Jay Vosburgh
2007-03-08 23:13 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:09 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:16 ` [PATCH] skge: set mac address bonding fix Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-12 22:39 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 23:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-13 0:37 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-15 14:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 22:28 ` skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-05-09 0:06 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:37 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9975.1173389861@death \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cbs@cts.ucla.edu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.