From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
Linux filesystem caching discussion list
<linux-cachefs@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Incorrect circular locking dependency?
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:37:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24075.1248705430@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hvdmos4i8.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.30-test #7
> -------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&cwq->lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&q->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
Okay. I think I understand this:
(1) cachefiles_read_waiter() intercepts wake up events, and, as such, is run
inside the waitqueue spinlock for the page bit waitqueue.
(2) cachefiles_read_waiter() calls fscache_enqueue_retrieval() which calls
fscache_enqueue_operation() which calls schedule_work() for fast
operations, thus taking a per-CPU workqueue spinlock.
(3) queue_work(), which is called by many things, calls __queue_work(), which
takes the per-CPU workqueue spinlock.
(4) __queue_work() then calls insert_work(), which calls wake_up(), which
takes the waitqueue spinlock for the per-CPU workqueue waitqueue.
Even though the two waitqueues are separate, I think lockdep sees them as
having the same lock.
Ingo: Is there any way around this?
David
---
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&q->lock){-.-.-.}:
> [<c0168746>] __lock_acquire+0xfd6/0x12d5
> [<c0168afc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> [<c03d1249>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x5e
> [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
> [<c0151053>] insert_work+0x7b/0x95
> [<c0151a02>] __queue_work+0x2e/0x4e
> [<c0151a5e>] delayed_work_timer_fn+0x3c/0x4f
> [<c014925b>] run_timer_softirq+0x180/0x206
> [<c01445cb>] __do_softirq+0xc3/0x18d
> [<c01446d9>] do_softirq+0x44/0x7a
> [<c0144823>] irq_exit+0x43/0x87
> [<c0117cbd>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7c/0x9b
> [<c0103956>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x40
> [<c0101ed0>] cpu_idle+0xa2/0xbe
> [<c03bcef6>] rest_init+0x66/0x79
> [<c0537a98>] start_kernel+0x396/0x3ae
> [<c053707f>] __init_begin+0x7f/0x98
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #0 (&cwq->lock){-.-...}:
> [<c0168496>] __lock_acquire+0xd26/0x12d5
> [<c0168afc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> [<c03d1249>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x5e
> [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c0151ab9>] queue_work_on+0x48/0x63
> [<c0151c1d>] queue_work+0x23/0x38
> [<c0151c50>] schedule_work+0x1e/0x31
> [<f7f9ed69>] fscache_enqueue_operation+0xc5/0x102 [fscache]
> [<f80b6142>] cachefiles_read_waiter+0xb3/0xcd [cachefiles]
> [<c01292ae>] __wake_up_common+0x4c/0x85
> [<c012ccae>] __wake_up+0x38/0x5c
> [<c015568f>] __wake_up_bit+0x34/0x4b
> [<c01ad459>] unlock_page+0x55/0x6a
> [<c020fb6b>] mpage_end_io_read+0x4e/0x71
> [<c020a4da>] bio_endio+0x31/0x44
> [<c027759c>] req_bio_endio+0xab/0xde
> [<c027774c>] blk_update_request+0x17d/0x321
> [<c0277912>] blk_update_bidi_request+0x22/0x62
> [<c02792c4>] blk_end_bidi_request+0x25/0x6e
> [<c0279371>] blk_end_request+0x1a/0x30
> [<f82811da>] scsi_io_completion+0x193/0x3bb [scsi_mod]
> [<f827a888>] scsi_finish_command+0xd9/0xf2 [scsi_mod]
> [<f8281522>] scsi_softirq_done+0xf4/0x10d [scsi_mod]
> [<c027fcdf>] blk_done_softirq+0x6f/0x8e
> [<c01445cb>] __do_softirq+0xc3/0x18d
> [<c01446d9>] do_softirq+0x44/0x7a
> [<c0144823>] irq_exit+0x43/0x87
> [<c01049fd>] do_IRQ+0x8d/0xb2
> [<c0103595>] common_interrupt+0x35/0x40
> [<c0101ed0>] cpu_idle+0xa2/0xbe
> [<c03bcef6>] rest_init+0x66/0x79
> [<c0537a98>] start_kernel+0x396/0x3ae
> [<c053707f>] __init_begin+0x7f/0x98
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> 1 lock held by swapper/0:
> #0: (&q->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30-test #7
> Call Trace:
> [<c03cde42>] ? printk+0x1d/0x33
> [<c0167349>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xaf/0xcb
> [<c0168496>] __lock_acquire+0xd26/0x12d5
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c0168afc>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c03d1249>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x5e
> [<c01519f3>] ? __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> [<c0151ab9>] queue_work_on+0x48/0x63
> [<c0151c1d>] queue_work+0x23/0x38
> [<c0151c50>] schedule_work+0x1e/0x31
> [<f7f9ed69>] fscache_enqueue_operation+0xc5/0x102 [fscache]
> [<f80b6142>] cachefiles_read_waiter+0xb3/0xcd [cachefiles]
> [<c01292ae>] __wake_up_common+0x4c/0x85
> [<c012ccae>] __wake_up+0x38/0x5c
> [<c015568f>] __wake_up_bit+0x34/0x4b
> [<c01ad459>] unlock_page+0x55/0x6a
> [<c020fb6b>] mpage_end_io_read+0x4e/0x71
> [<c020a4da>] bio_endio+0x31/0x44
> [<c027759c>] req_bio_endio+0xab/0xde
> [<c027774c>] blk_update_request+0x17d/0x321
> [<c0277912>] blk_update_bidi_request+0x22/0x62
> [<c02792c4>] blk_end_bidi_request+0x25/0x6e
> [<c0279371>] blk_end_request+0x1a/0x30
> [<f82811da>] scsi_io_completion+0x193/0x3bb [scsi_mod]
> [<c0166b5b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x19/0x2c
> [<f8280f43>] ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x92/0xaa [scsi_mod]
> [<f827a888>] scsi_finish_command+0xd9/0xf2 [scsi_mod]
> [<f8281522>] scsi_softirq_done+0xf4/0x10d [scsi_mod]
> [<c027fcdf>] blk_done_softirq+0x6f/0x8e
> [<c01445cb>] __do_softirq+0xc3/0x18d
> [<c01446d9>] do_softirq+0x44/0x7a
> [<c0144823>] irq_exit+0x43/0x87
> [<c01049fd>] do_IRQ+0x8d/0xb2
> [<c0103595>] common_interrupt+0x35/0x40
> [<c0109860>] ? mwait_idle+0x98/0xec
> [<c0101ed0>] cpu_idle+0xa2/0xbe
> [<c03bcef6>] rest_init+0x66/0x79
> [<c0537a98>] start_kernel+0x396/0x3ae
> [<c053707f>] __init_begin+0x7f/0x98
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-22 2:37 CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file Christian Kujau
2009-06-22 8:58 ` [Linux-cachefs] " David Howells
2009-06-22 14:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-22 15:21 ` David Howells
2009-06-22 15:45 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07 7:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07 13:00 ` David Howells
2009-07-07 13:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-27 14:37 ` David Howells [this message]
2009-08-04 14:51 ` Incorrect circular locking dependency? Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-04 15:50 ` David Howells
2009-08-04 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-04 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-04 17:23 ` [Linux-cachefs] CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file David Howells
2009-08-05 10:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-08-07 12:07 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-08-07 14:26 ` David Howells
2009-06-23 0:36 ` Christian Kujau
2009-06-23 7:49 ` Christian Kujau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24075.1248705430@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.