All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	Linux filesystem caching discussion list 
	<linux-cachefs@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:23:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3776.1249406624@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hvdmos4i8.wl%tiwai@suse.de>


Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:

> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.30-test #7
> -------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (&cwq->lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&q->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> ...

Can you try the attached patch from Peter Zijlstra?  It should cause the work
queue's waitqueue spinlock to have a separate lockdep class from the page
bit's waitqueue.

David
---
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Give waitqueue spinlocks their own lockdep classes

Give waitqueue spinlocks their own lockdep classes when they are initialised
from init_waitqueue_head().  This means that struct wait_queue::func functions
can operate other waitqueues.

This is used by CacheFiles to catch the page from a backing fs being unlocked
and to wake up another thread to take a copy of it.
---

 include/linux/wait.h |    9 ++++++++-
 kernel/wait.c        |    5 +++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index 6788e1a..cf3c2f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -77,7 +77,14 @@ struct task_struct;
 #define __WAIT_BIT_KEY_INITIALIZER(word, bit)				\
 	{ .flags = word, .bit_nr = bit, }
 
-extern void init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q);
+extern void __init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q, struct lock_class_key *);
+
+#define init_waitqueue_head(q)				\
+	do {						\
+		static struct lock_class_key __key;	\
+							\
+		__init_waitqueue_head((q), &__key);	\
+	} while (0)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 # define __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) \
diff --git a/kernel/wait.c b/kernel/wait.c
index ea7c3b4..c4bd3d8 100644
--- a/kernel/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/wait.c
@@ -10,13 +10,14 @@
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/hash.h>
 
-void init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q)
+void __init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q, struct lock_class_key *key)
 {
 	spin_lock_init(&q->lock);
+	lockdep_set_class(&q->lock, key);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->task_list);
 }
 
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_waitqueue_head);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__init_waitqueue_head);
 
 void add_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
 {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-04 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-22  2:37 CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file Christian Kujau
2009-06-22  8:58 ` [Linux-cachefs] " David Howells
2009-06-22 14:54   ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-22 15:21     ` David Howells
2009-06-22 15:45       ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07  7:21     ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07 13:00       ` David Howells
2009-07-07 13:05         ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-27 14:37     ` Incorrect circular locking dependency? David Howells
2009-08-04 14:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-04 15:50         ` David Howells
2009-08-04 16:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-04 15:59         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-04 17:23     ` David Howells [this message]
2009-08-05 10:00       ` [Linux-cachefs] CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file Takashi Iwai
2009-08-07 12:07       ` Takashi Iwai
2009-08-07 14:26         ` David Howells
2009-06-23  0:36   ` Christian Kujau
2009-06-23  7:49     ` Christian Kujau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3776.1249406624@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.