From: 함명주 <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
박경민 <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:12:53 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24090250.39821300695171946.JavaMail.weblogic@epml12> (raw)
> Sender : Stephen Rothwell<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date : 2011-03-21 11:59 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:170: error: unknown field 'bus_lock' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:170: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:171: error: unknown field 'bus_sync_unlock' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:171: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:172: error: unknown field 'mask' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:172: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:173: error: unknown field 'unmask' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:173: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>
> Caused by commit d7d21d394c9d ("mfd: Add MAX8997/8966 IRQ control feature").
>
> The presence of these fields depends on
> CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED not being set.
>
> I have reverted that commit for today.
Hello Stephen,
I've just submitted a corrected patch that works with
CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED being either set or unset.
Because it appears that we still have targets with deprecated functions,
I left the deprecated functions working as well as the new ones.
Thank you.
- MyungJoo.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>
>
MyungJoo Ham (함명주)
Mobile Software Platform Lab,
Digital Media and Communications (DMC) Business
Samsung Electronics
cell: +82-10-6714-2858 / office: +82-31-279-8033
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: 함명주 <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
박경민 <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:12:53 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24090250.39821300695171946.JavaMail.weblogic@epml12> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr, Size: 1977 bytes --]
> Sender : Stephen Rothwell<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date : 2011-03-21 11:59 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:170: error: unknown field 'bus_lock' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:170: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:171: error: unknown field 'bus_sync_unlock' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:171: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:172: error: unknown field 'mask' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:172: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:173: error: unknown field 'unmask' specified in initializer
> drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c:173: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>
> Caused by commit d7d21d394c9d ("mfd: Add MAX8997/8966 IRQ control feature").
>
> The presence of these fields depends on
> CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED not being set.
>
> I have reverted that commit for today.
Hello Stephen,
I've just submitted a corrected patch that works with
CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED being either set or unset.
Because it appears that we still have targets with deprecated functions,
I left the deprecated functions working as well as the new ones.
Thank you.
- MyungJoo.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>
>
MyungJoo Ham (ÇÔ¸íÁÖ)
Mobile Software Platform Lab,
Digital Media and Communications (DMC) Business
Samsung Electronics
cell: +82-10-6714-2858 / office: +82-31-279-8033ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-21 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-21 8:12 함명주 [this message]
2011-03-21 8:12 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related) 함명주
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-18 7:19 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-19 8:24 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-06-20 2:25 ` Chao Xie
2012-09-17 11:38 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-17 13:28 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-21 6:33 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-21 10:51 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-21 10:51 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-21 12:24 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-22 17:30 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-03-28 3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-21 2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-20 8:21 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-20 10:33 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-12-20 10:52 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-20 12:18 ` Mark Brown
2010-09-14 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-14 5:05 ` Arun MURTHY
2010-09-16 7:15 ` Arun MURTHY
2010-09-16 7:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 8:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24090250.39821300695171946.JavaMail.weblogic@epml12 \
--to=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.