From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>,
Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Uecker <muecker@gwdg.de>, Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:21:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2426aec9-e8a8-4823-b140-888da6c2240a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdTqVjaUERRpA+m-ikFmuYPSzQTm+aaa_f__duVht+74pQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/07/2024 17:11, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 16:54, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> At least, I hope there's consensus that while current GCC doesn't warn
>> about this, ideally it should, which means it should warn for valid uses
>> of strtol(3), which means strtol(3) should be fixed, in all of ISO,
>> POSIX, and glibc.
>
> I'm not convinced. It doesn't look like anybody else is convinced. I
> wouldn't call that consensus.
And what's more this prototype is defined by the C standard. If you have a beef with that, then you should take it up with the committee; I can't see GCC wanting to be different on this.
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-05 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240705130249.14116-2-alx@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <38982a470643f766747b0ca06b27ca859a87b101.camel@xry111.site>
2024-07-05 14:37 ` [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 15:02 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 15:23 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 15:34 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 15:53 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 16:01 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-05 16:17 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-05 16:24 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 16:30 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 19:28 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 19:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 19:47 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 19:52 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 20:11 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 20:15 ` Emanuele Torre
2024-07-05 20:31 ` Ben Boeckel
2024-07-05 20:25 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 20:28 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 20:41 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 20:55 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 21:39 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 22:02 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 22:04 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-06 2:24 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-06 2:39 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-06 5:51 ` [[gnu::null_terminated_string_arg(1)]] on strtol(1) (was: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like) functions Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-06 6:10 ` [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-06 6:11 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 16:32 ` Sam James
2024-07-05 16:02 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 16:11 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 16:21 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists) [this message]
2024-07-05 15:54 ` LIU Hao
2024-07-05 15:55 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-05 16:32 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 17:32 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 19:41 ` [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 15:46 ` Daniel Plakosh
2024-07-09 19:00 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 20:04 ` Daniel Plakosh
2024-07-07 1:58 ` WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 7:15 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-07 11:07 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 12:21 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-07 13:10 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 10:42 ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-07 12:42 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 17:30 ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-07 22:52 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 12:09 ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-09 17:36 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-08 14:30 ` David Malcolm
2024-07-08 15:01 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-08 16:05 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-08 20:17 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 5:58 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-09 9:26 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-08 22:48 ` David Malcolm
2024-07-09 9:07 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 9:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-07-09 10:28 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 11:28 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 22:42 ` n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 16:24 ` Joseph Myers
2024-07-26 16:35 ` G. Branden Robinson
2024-07-26 19:53 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 18:50 ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-26 20:11 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 20:30 ` Joseph Myers
2024-07-26 21:14 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 21:22 ` Joseph Myers
2024-07-26 21:49 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 22:03 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-26 22:26 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 22:59 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-27 8:44 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2426aec9-e8a8-4823-b140-888da6c2240a@arm.com \
--to=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muecker@gwdg.de \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.