All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, uecker@tugraz.at, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	 Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org,  xry111@xry111.site, jakub@redhat.com,
	lh_mouse@126.com,  jwakely.gcc@gmail.com,
	Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, sam@gentoo.org,
	 ben.boeckel@kitware.com, heiko.eissfeldt@siemens.com,
	dmalcolm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:22:42 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7d6847e-9028-cc8d-62c4-89bb83f52c8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amyvxtyogghmybjpyqa26reuztb7ilvwxbzv4w3npehcstpzeu@j5pt4pwpqnjn>

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:

> > See reflector message SC22WG14.18575, 17 Nov 2020 (the former convenor 
> > replying when I asked about just that paper).
> 
> Where can I find reflector messages?

https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/18575

> And another one to propose that [n] means the same as [static n] except
> for the nonnull property of static.

I'm not convinced that introducing extra undefined behavior for things 
that have been valid since C89 (which would be the effect of such a change 
for any code that passes a smaller array) is a good idea - the general 
mood is to *reduce* undefined behavior.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-26 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240705130249.14116-2-alx@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <38982a470643f766747b0ca06b27ca859a87b101.camel@xry111.site>
2024-07-05 14:37   ` [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 15:02     ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 15:23       ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 15:34         ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 15:53           ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 16:01             ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-05 16:17               ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-05 16:24               ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 16:30                 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 19:28                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 19:38                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 19:47                       ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 19:52                         ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 20:11                           ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 20:15                           ` Emanuele Torre
2024-07-05 20:31                             ` Ben Boeckel
2024-07-05 20:25                     ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 20:28                       ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 20:41                         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 20:55                         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 21:39                           ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 22:02                             ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 22:04                               ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-06  2:24                               ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-06  2:39                                 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-06  5:51                                   ` [[gnu::null_terminated_string_arg(1)]] on strtol(1) (was: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like) functions Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-06  6:10                                 ` [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-06  6:11                                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 16:32                 ` Sam James
2024-07-05 16:02             ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-05 16:11             ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-07-05 16:21               ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2024-07-05 15:54         ` LIU Hao
2024-07-05 15:55         ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-05 16:32           ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 17:32             ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-05 19:41 ` [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 15:46   ` Daniel Plakosh
2024-07-09 19:00     ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 20:04       ` Daniel Plakosh
2024-07-07  1:58 ` WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07  7:15   ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-07 11:07     ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 12:21       ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-07 13:10         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 10:42   ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-07 12:42     ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-07 17:30       ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-07 22:52         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 12:09           ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-09 17:36             ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-08 14:30       ` David Malcolm
2024-07-08 15:01         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-08 16:05           ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-08 20:17             ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09  5:58               ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-09  9:26                 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-08 22:48           ` David Malcolm
2024-07-09  9:07             ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09  9:18               ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-07-09 10:28                 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 11:28                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-09 22:42   ` n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 16:24     ` Joseph Myers
2024-07-26 16:35       ` G. Branden Robinson
2024-07-26 19:53         ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 18:50       ` Paul Eggert
2024-07-26 20:11       ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 20:30         ` Joseph Myers
2024-07-26 21:14           ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 21:22             ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2024-07-26 21:49               ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 22:03                 ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-26 22:26                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-07-26 22:59                     ` Martin Uecker
2024-07-27  8:44                       ` Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7d6847e-9028-cc8d-62c4-89bb83f52c8@redhat.com \
    --to=josmyers@redhat.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=ben.boeckel@kitware.com \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=heiko.eissfeldt@siemens.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=lh_mouse@126.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.