Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3528 SoC

From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>, Tim Lunn <tim@feathertop.org>,
	Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>,
	Muhammed Efe Cetin <efectn@protonmail.com>,
	Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>,
	Ondrej Jirman <megi@xff.cz>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3528 SoC
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:21:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2429972.SyXcmblsem@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6320e4f3-e737-4787-8a72-7bd314ba883c@kernel.org>

Am Dienstag, 13. August 2024, 18:38:58 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 04/08/2024 16:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 04/08/2024 15:20, Yao Zi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >>>> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> >>>> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >>>> +		clock-output-names = "xin24m";
> >>>> +	};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	gic: interrupt-controller@fed01000 {
> >>>
> >>> Why this all is outside of SoC?
> >>
> >> Just as Heiko says, device tree for all other Rockchip SoCs don't have
> >> a "soc" node. I didn't know why before but just follow the style.
> >>
> >> If you prefer add a soc node, I am willing to.
> > 
> > Surprising as usually we expect MMIO nodes being part of SoC to be under
> > soc@, but if that's Rockchip preference then fine.
> 
> One more comment, I forgot we actually have it documented long time ago:
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L90

Thanks for finding that block.

I guess we'll follow that advice then and go with a soc node :-) .

Heiko

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip