All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>,
	"Hans Verkuil" <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	tomoharu.fukawa.eb@renesas.com,
	"Kieran Bingham" <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
	"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] media: rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver driver
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 08:17:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2456560.miCsvfXtsD@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171110223227.pug7d4qi7rdi4b4b@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>

Hi Sakari,

On Saturday, 11 November 2017 00:32:27 EET Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:31:37PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > A V4L2 driver for Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver. The driver
> > supports the rcar-vin driver on R-Car Gen3 SoCs where separate CSI-2
> > hardware blocks are connected between the video sources and the video
> > grabbers (VIN).
> > 
> > Driver is based on a prototype by Koji Matsuoka in the Renesas BSP.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/Kconfig     |  12 +
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/Makefile    |   1 +
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c | 934 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 947 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c

[snip]

> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000..27d09da191a09b39
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c

[snip]

> > +static int rcar_csi2_calc_phypll(struct rcar_csi2 *priv,
> > +				 struct v4l2_subdev *source,
> > +				 struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf,
> > +				 u32 *phypll)
> > +{
> > +	const struct phypll_hsfreqrange *hsfreq;
> > +	const struct rcar_csi2_format *format;
> > +	struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
> > +	u64 mbps;
> > +
> > +	ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(source->ctrl_handler, V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE);
> 
> How about LINK_FREQ instead? It'd be more straightforward to calculate
> this. Up to you.

This probably needs to be documented, but I think the official API is 
V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE. The link frequency control is not mandatory.

> > +	if (!ctrl) {
> > +		dev_err(priv->dev, "no link freq control in subdev %s\n",
> > +			source->name);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	format = rcar_csi2_code_to_fmt(mf->code);
> > +	if (!format) {
> > +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Unknown format: %d\n", mf->code);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	mbps = v4l2_ctrl_g_ctrl_int64(ctrl) * format->bpp;
> > +	do_div(mbps, priv->lanes * 1000000);
> > +
> > +	for (hsfreq = priv->info->hsfreqrange; hsfreq->mbps != 0; hsfreq++)
> > +		if (hsfreq->mbps >= mbps)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +	if (!hsfreq->mbps) {
> > +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Unsupported PHY speed (%llu Mbps)", mbps);
> > +		return -ERANGE;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev_dbg(priv->dev, "PHY HSFREQRANGE requested %llu got %u Mbps\n", 
mbps,
> > +		hsfreq->mbps);
> > +
> > +	*phypll = PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE(hsfreq->reg);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}

[snip]

> > +static int rcar_csi2_s_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
> > +{
> > +	struct rcar_csi2 *priv = sd_to_csi2(sd);
> > +
> > +	if (on)
> > +		pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
> > +	else
> > +		pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
> 
> The pipeline you have is already rather complex. Would it be an option to
> power the hardware on when streaming is started? The smiapp driver does
> this, without even implementing the s_power callback. (You'd still need to
> call it on the image source, as long as we have drivers that need it.)

We've briefly discussed this before, and I agree that pipeline power 
management needs to be redesigned, but we still haven't agreed on a proper 
architecture for that. Feel free to propose an RFC :-) In the meantime I 
wouldn't try to enforce one specific model.

> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}

[snip]

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Niklas Söderlund"
	<niklas.soderlund+renesas-1zkq55x86MTxsAP9Fp7wbw@public.gmane.org>,
	"Hans Verkuil" <hverkuil-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	tomoharu.fukawa.eb-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	"Kieran Bingham"
	<kieran.bingham-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
	"Sakari Ailus"
	<sakari.ailus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven"
	<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] media: rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver driver
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 08:17:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2456560.miCsvfXtsD@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171110223227.pug7d4qi7rdi4b4b-S+BSfZ9RZZmRSg0ZkenSGLdO1Tsj/99ntUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org>

Hi Sakari,

On Saturday, 11 November 2017 00:32:27 EET Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:31:37PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > A V4L2 driver for Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver. The driver
> > supports the rcar-vin driver on R-Car Gen3 SoCs where separate CSI-2
> > hardware blocks are connected between the video sources and the video
> > grabbers (VIN).
> > 
> > Driver is based on a prototype by Koji Matsuoka in the Renesas BSP.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/Kconfig     |  12 +
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/Makefile    |   1 +
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c | 934 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 947 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c

[snip]

> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000..27d09da191a09b39
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c

[snip]

> > +static int rcar_csi2_calc_phypll(struct rcar_csi2 *priv,
> > +				 struct v4l2_subdev *source,
> > +				 struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf,
> > +				 u32 *phypll)
> > +{
> > +	const struct phypll_hsfreqrange *hsfreq;
> > +	const struct rcar_csi2_format *format;
> > +	struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
> > +	u64 mbps;
> > +
> > +	ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(source->ctrl_handler, V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE);
> 
> How about LINK_FREQ instead? It'd be more straightforward to calculate
> this. Up to you.

This probably needs to be documented, but I think the official API is 
V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE. The link frequency control is not mandatory.

> > +	if (!ctrl) {
> > +		dev_err(priv->dev, "no link freq control in subdev %s\n",
> > +			source->name);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	format = rcar_csi2_code_to_fmt(mf->code);
> > +	if (!format) {
> > +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Unknown format: %d\n", mf->code);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	mbps = v4l2_ctrl_g_ctrl_int64(ctrl) * format->bpp;
> > +	do_div(mbps, priv->lanes * 1000000);
> > +
> > +	for (hsfreq = priv->info->hsfreqrange; hsfreq->mbps != 0; hsfreq++)
> > +		if (hsfreq->mbps >= mbps)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +	if (!hsfreq->mbps) {
> > +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Unsupported PHY speed (%llu Mbps)", mbps);
> > +		return -ERANGE;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev_dbg(priv->dev, "PHY HSFREQRANGE requested %llu got %u Mbps\n", 
mbps,
> > +		hsfreq->mbps);
> > +
> > +	*phypll = PHYPLL_HSFREQRANGE(hsfreq->reg);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}

[snip]

> > +static int rcar_csi2_s_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
> > +{
> > +	struct rcar_csi2 *priv = sd_to_csi2(sd);
> > +
> > +	if (on)
> > +		pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
> > +	else
> > +		pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
> 
> The pipeline you have is already rather complex. Would it be an option to
> power the hardware on when streaming is started? The smiapp driver does
> this, without even implementing the s_power callback. (You'd still need to
> call it on the image source, as long as we have drivers that need it.)

We've briefly discussed this before, and I agree that pipeline power 
management needs to be redesigned, but we still haven't agreed on a proper 
architecture for that. Feel free to propose an RFC :-) In the meantime I 
wouldn't try to enforce one specific model.

> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}

[snip]

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-11  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-10 13:31 [PATCH v10 0/2] media: rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-10 13:31 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-10 13:31 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] media: rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver documentation Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-10 22:11   ` Sakari Ailus
2017-11-10 22:11     ` Sakari Ailus
2017-11-10 22:41     ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-10 22:41       ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-10 13:31 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] media: rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver driver Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-10 22:32   ` Sakari Ailus
2017-11-10 22:32     ` Sakari Ailus
2017-11-10 22:32     ` Sakari Ailus
2017-11-11  0:11     ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-11  0:11       ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-11  6:34       ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-11-11 23:32       ` Sakari Ailus
2017-11-11 23:32         ` Sakari Ailus
2017-11-11  6:17     ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-11-11  6:17       ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-11-11 23:38       ` Sakari Ailus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2456560.miCsvfXtsD@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tomoharu.fukawa.eb@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.