All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0 dtsi: Add missing "gpio-ranges" to gpio node
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:48:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2477426.ekHmTUkfBY@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435650327-2542-4-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 30 June 2015 09:45:23 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If a GPIO driver uses gpiochip_add_pin_range() (which is usually the
> case for GPIO/PFC combos), the GPIO hogging mechanism configured from DT
> doesn't work:
> 
>     requesting hog GPIO led1-high (chip sh73a0_pfc, offset 20) failed
> 
> The actual error code is -517 == -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> The problem is that PFC+GPIO registration is handled in multiple steps:
>   1. pinctrl_register(),
>   2. gpiochip_add(),
>   3. gpiochip_add_pin_range().
> 
> Configuration of the hogs is handled in gpiochip_add():
> 
>     gpiochip_add
>         of_gpiochip_add
>             of_gpiochip_scan_hogs
>                 gpiod_hog
>                     gpiochip_request_own_desc
>                         __gpiod_request
>                             chip->request
>                                 pinctrl_request_gpio
>                                     pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range
> 
> However, at this point the GPIO controller hasn't been added to
> pinctrldev_list yet, so the range can't be found, and the operation fails
> with -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> To fix this, add a "gpio-ranges" property to the gpio device node, so
> the ranges are added by of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(), which is called by
> of_gpiochip_add() before the call to of_gpiochip_scan_hogs().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

This looks sane to me, even though referencing the same DT node seems a bit 
dodgy. I'll let Linus comment on that, but for the implementation itself,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> index 11e17c5f26e2cae2..ff7c8f298f30a58d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> @@ -392,6 +392,9 @@
>  		      <0xe605801c 0x1c>;
>  		gpio-controller;
>  		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-ranges =
> +			<&pfc 0 0 119>, <&pfc 128 128 37>, <&pfc 192 192 91>,
> +			<&pfc 288 288 22>;
>  		interrupts-extended =
>  			<&irqpin0 0 0>, <&irqpin0 1 0>, <&irqpin0 2 0>, <&irqpin0 3 0>,
>  			<&irqpin0 4 0>, <&irqpin0 5 0>, <&irqpin0 6 0>, <&irqpin0 7 0>,

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0 dtsi: Add missing "gpio-ranges" to gpio node
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:48:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2477426.ekHmTUkfBY@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435650327-2542-4-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 30 June 2015 09:45:23 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If a GPIO driver uses gpiochip_add_pin_range() (which is usually the
> case for GPIO/PFC combos), the GPIO hogging mechanism configured from DT
> doesn't work:
> 
>     requesting hog GPIO led1-high (chip sh73a0_pfc, offset 20) failed
> 
> The actual error code is -517 = -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> The problem is that PFC+GPIO registration is handled in multiple steps:
>   1. pinctrl_register(),
>   2. gpiochip_add(),
>   3. gpiochip_add_pin_range().
> 
> Configuration of the hogs is handled in gpiochip_add():
> 
>     gpiochip_add
>         of_gpiochip_add
>             of_gpiochip_scan_hogs
>                 gpiod_hog
>                     gpiochip_request_own_desc
>                         __gpiod_request
>                             chip->request
>                                 pinctrl_request_gpio
>                                     pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range
> 
> However, at this point the GPIO controller hasn't been added to
> pinctrldev_list yet, so the range can't be found, and the operation fails
> with -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> To fix this, add a "gpio-ranges" property to the gpio device node, so
> the ranges are added by of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(), which is called by
> of_gpiochip_add() before the call to of_gpiochip_scan_hogs().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

This looks sane to me, even though referencing the same DT node seems a bit 
dodgy. I'll let Linus comment on that, but for the implementation itself,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> index 11e17c5f26e2cae2..ff7c8f298f30a58d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> @@ -392,6 +392,9 @@
>  		      <0xe605801c 0x1c>;
>  		gpio-controller;
>  		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-ranges > +			<&pfc 0 0 119>, <&pfc 128 128 37>, <&pfc 192 192 91>,
> +			<&pfc 288 288 22>;
>  		interrupts-extended >  			<&irqpin0 0 0>, <&irqpin0 1 0>, <&irqpin0 2 0>, <&irqpin0 3 0>,
>  			<&irqpin0 4 0>, <&irqpin0 5 0>, <&irqpin0 6 0>, <&irqpin0 7 0>,

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0 dtsi: Add missing "gpio-ranges" to gpio node
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:48:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2477426.ekHmTUkfBY@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435650327-2542-4-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 30 June 2015 09:45:23 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If a GPIO driver uses gpiochip_add_pin_range() (which is usually the
> case for GPIO/PFC combos), the GPIO hogging mechanism configured from DT
> doesn't work:
> 
>     requesting hog GPIO led1-high (chip sh73a0_pfc, offset 20) failed
> 
> The actual error code is -517 == -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> The problem is that PFC+GPIO registration is handled in multiple steps:
>   1. pinctrl_register(),
>   2. gpiochip_add(),
>   3. gpiochip_add_pin_range().
> 
> Configuration of the hogs is handled in gpiochip_add():
> 
>     gpiochip_add
>         of_gpiochip_add
>             of_gpiochip_scan_hogs
>                 gpiod_hog
>                     gpiochip_request_own_desc
>                         __gpiod_request
>                             chip->request
>                                 pinctrl_request_gpio
>                                     pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range
> 
> However, at this point the GPIO controller hasn't been added to
> pinctrldev_list yet, so the range can't be found, and the operation fails
> with -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> To fix this, add a "gpio-ranges" property to the gpio device node, so
> the ranges are added by of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(), which is called by
> of_gpiochip_add() before the call to of_gpiochip_scan_hogs().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

This looks sane to me, even though referencing the same DT node seems a bit 
dodgy. I'll let Linus comment on that, but for the implementation itself,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> index 11e17c5f26e2cae2..ff7c8f298f30a58d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
> @@ -392,6 +392,9 @@
>  		      <0xe605801c 0x1c>;
>  		gpio-controller;
>  		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		gpio-ranges =
> +			<&pfc 0 0 119>, <&pfc 128 128 37>, <&pfc 192 192 91>,
> +			<&pfc 288 288 22>;
>  		interrupts-extended =
>  			<&irqpin0 0 0>, <&irqpin0 1 0>, <&irqpin0 2 0>, <&irqpin0 3 0>,
>  			<&irqpin0 4 0>, <&irqpin0 5 0>, <&irqpin0 6 0>, <&irqpin0 7 0>,

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-30  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-30  7:45 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: Move gpio ranges from C code to DT Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4 dtsi: Add missing "gpio-ranges" to gpio node Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:49   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:49     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:49     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-07-14 12:05     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-14 12:05       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-14 12:05       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-16  9:42       ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-16  9:42         ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-16  9:42         ` Linus Walleij
2015-06-30  7:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: shmobile: r8a7740 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:41   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:41     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:41     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  7:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:48   ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-06-30  9:48     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:48     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  7:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Stop calling gpiochip_add_pin_range() on DT platforms Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:30   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:30     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:30     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:44     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:44       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:44       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:54       ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:54         ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:54         ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  7:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Remove empty gpio_function_free() Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:34   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:34     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:34     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  7:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Move sh_pfc_add_gpiochip() up Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:35   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:35     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:35     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  7:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Confine legacy function GPIOs to SH Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  7:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:38   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:38     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:38     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-30  9:48     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:48       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30  9:48       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-16  9:00 ` [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: Move gpio ranges from C code to DT Linus Walleij
2015-07-16  9:00   ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-16  9:00   ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-16  9:06   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-16  9:06     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-16  9:06     ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2477426.ekHmTUkfBY@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=bparrot@ti.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.