All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jérôme Pouiller" <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <musamaanjum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: remove unused included header files
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:45:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2505525.pDR9D5mlbe@pc-42> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEdzHxR2VOwS8Fr/@kroah.com>

On Tuesday 9 March 2021 14:07:43 CET Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 10:43:45AM +0100, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> > Hello Greg,
> >
> > On Tuesday 2 March 2021 16:01:25 CET Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> > > Hello Muhammad,
> > >
> > > Sorry, I am a bit late for the review of this patch. Thank you for 
your
> > > contribution.
> > >
> > > On Thursday 11 February 2021 15:36:37 CET Muhammad Usama Anjum 
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Many header files have been included, but never used. Those 
header
> > > > files have been removed.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <musamaanjum@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c              | 1 -
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h              | 4 ----
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/bus.h             | 3 ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c        | 6 ------
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c         | 7 -------
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/data_rx.c         | 5 -----
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c         | 5 -----
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.h         | 3 ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c           | 6 ------
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c            | 2 --
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h     | 4 ----
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_general.h | 9 ---------
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c          | 4 ----
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx_mib.c      | 5 -----
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/hwio.c            | 3 ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/hwio.h            | 2 --
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/key.c             | 2 --
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/key.h             | 2 --
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/main.c            | 7 -------
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/main.h            | 3 ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c           | 4 ----
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/queue.h           | 3 ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/scan.h            | 2 --
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c             | 6 ------
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/sta.h             | 2 --
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/traces.h          | 3 ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h             | 3 ---
> > > >  27 files changed, 106 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
> > > > index ed53d0b45592..cd6bcfdfbe9a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
> > > > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> > > >   * Copyright (c) 2017-2020, Silicon Laboratories, Inc.
> > > >   * Copyright (c) 2010, ST-Ericsson
> > > >   */
> > > > -#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > >  #include <net/mac80211.h>
> > >
> > > Though bh.c refers to gpiod_set_value_cansleep()
> > >
> > >
> > > >  #include "bh.h"
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h
> > > > index 78c49329e22a..92ef3298d4ac 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h
> > > > @@ -8,10 +8,6 @@
> > > >  #ifndef WFX_BH_H
> > > >  #define WFX_BH_H
> > > >
> > > > -#include <linux/atomic.h>
> > > > -#include <linux/wait.h>
> > > > -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > > -
> > > >  struct wfx_dev;
> > > >
> > > >  struct wfx_hif {
> > >
> > > Ditto, bh.h refers to atomic_t, struct work_struct and struct
> > > completion. If you try to compile bh.h alone (with something like
> > > gcc -xc .../bh.h) it won't work.
> > >
> > > Maybe it works now because we are lucky in the order the headers 
are
> > > included, but I think it is not sufficient.
> > >
> > > [... same problem repeats multiple times in the following ...]
> > >
> >
> > Greg, if nobody has any opinion on that, I think that this patch 
should
> > be reverted.
> 
> Nothing is breaking, why should it be reverted?

Because it is less maintainable?
 
> You never build a .h file alone :)

hmmm... notwithstanding, I thing that the code should not depend on the 
order the headers are included. You don't?
 
> Anyway, sure, I'll revert it, what is the commit id?

commit 314fd52f01ea "staging: wfx: remove unused included header files"

Thank you!

-- 
Jérôme Pouiller



  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-11 14:36 [PATCH] staging: wfx: remove unused included header files Muhammad Usama Anjum
2021-03-02 15:01 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2021-03-04  9:43   ` Jérôme Pouiller
2021-03-09 13:07     ` Greg KH
2021-03-09 13:45       ` Jérôme Pouiller [this message]
2021-03-09 14:54         ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2505525.pDR9D5mlbe@pc-42 \
    --to=jerome.pouiller@silabs.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=musamaanjum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.