From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Jérôme Pouiller" <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <musamaanjum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: remove unused included header files
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 15:54:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEeMOILptrEY2WTV@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2505525.pDR9D5mlbe@pc-42>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 02:45:56PM +0100, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> On Tuesday 9 March 2021 14:07:43 CET Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 10:43:45AM +0100, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> > > Hello Greg,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 2 March 2021 16:01:25 CET Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> > > > Hello Muhammad,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I am a bit late for the review of this patch. Thank you for
> your
> > > > contribution.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 11 February 2021 15:36:37 CET Muhammad Usama Anjum
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Many header files have been included, but never used. Those
> header
> > > > > files have been removed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <musamaanjum@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c | 1 -
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h | 4 ----
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/bus.h | 3 ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c | 6 ------
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c | 7 -------
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/data_rx.c | 5 -----
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c | 5 -----
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.h | 3 ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c | 6 ------
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 2 --
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h | 4 ----
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_general.h | 9 ---------
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c | 4 ----
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx_mib.c | 5 -----
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hwio.c | 3 ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/hwio.h | 2 --
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/key.c | 2 --
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/key.h | 2 --
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/main.c | 7 -------
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/main.h | 3 ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c | 4 ----
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/queue.h | 3 ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/scan.h | 2 --
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c | 6 ------
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/sta.h | 2 --
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/traces.h | 3 ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h | 3 ---
> > > > > 27 files changed, 106 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
> > > > > index ed53d0b45592..cd6bcfdfbe9a 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
> > > > > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> > > > > * Copyright (c) 2017-2020, Silicon Laboratories, Inc.
> > > > > * Copyright (c) 2010, ST-Ericsson
> > > > > */
> > > > > -#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > > > #include <net/mac80211.h>
> > > >
> > > > Though bh.c refers to gpiod_set_value_cansleep()
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > #include "bh.h"
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h
> > > > > index 78c49329e22a..92ef3298d4ac 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.h
> > > > > @@ -8,10 +8,6 @@
> > > > > #ifndef WFX_BH_H
> > > > > #define WFX_BH_H
> > > > >
> > > > > -#include <linux/atomic.h>
> > > > > -#include <linux/wait.h>
> > > > > -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > > > -
> > > > > struct wfx_dev;
> > > > >
> > > > > struct wfx_hif {
> > > >
> > > > Ditto, bh.h refers to atomic_t, struct work_struct and struct
> > > > completion. If you try to compile bh.h alone (with something like
> > > > gcc -xc .../bh.h) it won't work.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it works now because we are lucky in the order the headers
> are
> > > > included, but I think it is not sufficient.
> > > >
> > > > [... same problem repeats multiple times in the following ...]
> > > >
> > >
> > > Greg, if nobody has any opinion on that, I think that this patch
> should
> > > be reverted.
> >
> > Nothing is breaking, why should it be reverted?
>
> Because it is less maintainable?
>
> > You never build a .h file alone :)
>
> hmmm... notwithstanding, I thing that the code should not depend on the
> order the headers are included. You don't?
>
> > Anyway, sure, I'll revert it, what is the commit id?
>
> commit 314fd52f01ea "staging: wfx: remove unused included header files"
Now reverted, thanks.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-11 14:36 [PATCH] staging: wfx: remove unused included header files Muhammad Usama Anjum
2021-03-02 15:01 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2021-03-04 9:43 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2021-03-09 13:07 ` Greg KH
2021-03-09 13:45 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2021-03-09 14:54 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YEeMOILptrEY2WTV@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=jerome.pouiller@silabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=musamaanjum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.