From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Philippe Proulx <pproulx@efficios.com>
Cc: Diamon discuss <diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>,
Genevieve Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>
Subject: Re: [diamon-discuss] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx pproulx@efficios.com wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam"
>> <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
>> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau"
>> <jgalar@efficios.com>
>> Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
>> <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25
>> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> ---
>> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644
>> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata):
>> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps
>> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the
>> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
>> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end
>> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
>> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream.
>> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
>> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the
>> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the
>
> "greater than or equal to"
done
>
>> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same
>> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to
>> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet
>
> "less than or equal to"
done,
Thanks!
Mathieu
>
> Phil
>
>> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
>> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream
>> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that
>> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in
>> --
> > 2.11.0
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Philippe Proulx <pproulx@efficios.com>
Cc: Diamon discuss <diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>,
Genevieve Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx pproulx@efficios.com wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam"
>> <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
>> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau"
>> <jgalar@efficios.com>
>> Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
>> <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25
>> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> ---
>> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644
>> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata):
>> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps
>> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the
>> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
>> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end
>> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
>> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream.
>> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
>> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the
>> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the
>
> "greater than or equal to"
done
>
>> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same
>> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to
>> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet
>
> "less than or equal to"
done,
Thanks!
Mathieu
>
> Phil
>
>> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
>> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream
>> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that
>> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in
>> --
> > 2.11.0
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Philippe Proulx <pproulx@efficios.com>
Cc: Diamon discuss <diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>,
Genevieve Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200428185445.kQa98SdG8tjzT5C511MXyTgbTQcBj8AGYEw6Kok1cAM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx pproulx@efficios.com wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam"
>> <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>,
>> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau"
>> <jgalar@efficios.com>
>> Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
>> <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25
>> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> ---
>> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644
>> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md
>> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata):
>> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps
>> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the
>> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
>> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end
>> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
>> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream.
>> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
>> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the
>> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the
>
> "greater than or equal to"
done
>
>> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same
>> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to
>> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet
>
> "less than or equal to"
done,
Thanks!
Mathieu
>
> Phil
>
>> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
>> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream
>> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that
>> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in
>> --
> > 2.11.0
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 20:52 [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3) Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 22:51 ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51 ` [diamon-discuss] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-28 18:51 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08 ` [diamon-discuss] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-29 12:08 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50 ` [diamon-discuss] " Philippe Proulx
2020-04-29 16:50 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2020-04-28 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 3/3] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=diamon-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gbastien+lttng@versatic.net \
--cc=jgalar@efficios.com \
--cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=pproulx@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.