Re: [scarthgap][PATCH] python3-py: ignore CVE-2022-42969

["Darsh Kelaiya -X (dkelaiya - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)" <dkelaiya@cisco.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1716 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 02:40 PM, Yoann Congal wrote:

> 
> On Wed Aug 26, 2026 at 7:32 AM CEST, Darsh Kelaiya -X (dkelaiya - E
> INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco) via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> 
>> From: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>
>> 
>> Analysis:
>> - NVD marks CVE-2022-42969 as disputed because multiple parties could
>> not reproduce it and argue that it is not a valid vulnerability [1].
>> - GitHub withdrew the advisory because the available evidence does not
>> show a valid, reproducible vulnerability [2].
>> - Wrynose and master use the same python3-py version and carry the same
>> disputed CVE status, so that disposition applies to Scarthgap [3].
>> - Hence ignoring the CVE for now.
>> 
>> Reference:
>> [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42969
>> [2] https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w596-4wvx-j9j6
>> [3] https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=91f6b85b36316d5940ee194b1d195caf3ac040b1
>> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> This CVE is already not in our metrics. Because OE-Core/scarthgap lacks
> these commits from meta-openembedded:
> * 1fac509459 (python3-py: set CVE_PRODUCT, 2025-12-31)
> * 26fa8b053b (python3-py: correct CVE_PRODUCT mapping, 2026-08-21)
> 
> Can you send a v2 series with these backports added?
> 
> Thanks!
> --
> Yoann Congal
> Smile ECS

Hi Yoann,

I’ve added the two requested python3-py backports in the v2 series:

https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/scarthgap_patch_v2_1_3/121047195

Thanks,
Darsh Kelaiya

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2185 bytes --]