[OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH] python3-py: ignore CVE-2022-42969

[OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH] python3-py: ignore CVE-2022-42969

[Darsh Kelaiya -X (dkelaiya - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)]

From: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>

Analysis:
- NVD marks CVE-2022-42969 as disputed because multiple parties could
  not reproduce it and argue that it is not a valid vulnerability [1].
- GitHub withdrew the advisory because the available evidence does not
  show a valid, reproducible vulnerability [2].
- Wrynose and master use the same python3-py version and carry the same
  disputed CVE status, so that disposition applies to Scarthgap [3].
- Hence ignoring the CVE for now.

Reference:
[1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42969
[2] https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w596-4wvx-j9j6
[3] https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=91f6b85b36316d5940ee194b1d195caf3ac040b1

Signed-off-by: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb
index 31d5a377a7..2a16c6406b 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=a6bb0320b04a0a503f12f69fea479de9"
 
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "51c75c4126074b472f746a24399ad32f6053d1b34b68d2fa41e558e6f4a98719"
 
+CVE_STATUS[CVE-2022-42969] = "disputed: upstream could not reproduce it and GitHub withdrew the advisory"
+
 DEPENDS += "python3-setuptools-scm-native"
 
 inherit pypi python_setuptools_build_meta
-- 
2.35.6

Re: [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH] python3-py: ignore CVE-2022-42969

[Yoann Congal]

On Wed Aug 26, 2026 at 7:32 AM CEST, Darsh Kelaiya -X (dkelaiya - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco) via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> From: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>
>
> Analysis:
> - NVD marks CVE-2022-42969 as disputed because multiple parties could
>   not reproduce it and argue that it is not a valid vulnerability [1].
> - GitHub withdrew the advisory because the available evidence does not
>   show a valid, reproducible vulnerability [2].
> - Wrynose and master use the same python3-py version and carry the same
>   disputed CVE status, so that disposition applies to Scarthgap [3].
> - Hence ignoring the CVE for now.
>
> Reference:
> [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42969
> [2] https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w596-4wvx-j9j6
> [3] https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=91f6b85b36316d5940ee194b1d195caf3ac040b1
>
> Signed-off-by: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Hello,

This CVE is already not in our metrics. Because OE-Core/scarthgap lacks
these commits from meta-openembedded:
* 1fac509459 (python3-py: set CVE_PRODUCT, 2025-12-31)
* 26fa8b053b (python3-py: correct CVE_PRODUCT mapping, 2026-08-21)

Can you send a v2 series with these backports added?

Thanks!
-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS

Re: [scarthgap][PATCH] python3-py: ignore CVE-2022-42969

[Darsh Kelaiya -X (dkelaiya - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1716 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 02:40 PM, Yoann Congal wrote:

> 
> On Wed Aug 26, 2026 at 7:32 AM CEST, Darsh Kelaiya -X (dkelaiya - E
> INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco) via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> 
>> From: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>
>> 
>> Analysis:
>> - NVD marks CVE-2022-42969 as disputed because multiple parties could
>> not reproduce it and argue that it is not a valid vulnerability [1].
>> - GitHub withdrew the advisory because the available evidence does not
>> show a valid, reproducible vulnerability [2].
>> - Wrynose and master use the same python3-py version and carry the same
>> disputed CVE status, so that disposition applies to Scarthgap [3].
>> - Hence ignoring the CVE for now.
>> 
>> Reference:
>> [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42969
>> [2] https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w596-4wvx-j9j6
>> [3] https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=91f6b85b36316d5940ee194b1d195caf3ac040b1
>> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Darsh Kelaiya <dkelaiya@cisco.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-py_1.11.0.bb | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> This CVE is already not in our metrics. Because OE-Core/scarthgap lacks
> these commits from meta-openembedded:
> * 1fac509459 (python3-py: set CVE_PRODUCT, 2025-12-31)
> * 26fa8b053b (python3-py: correct CVE_PRODUCT mapping, 2026-08-21)
> 
> Can you send a v2 series with these backports added?
> 
> Thanks!
> --
> Yoann Congal
> Smile ECS

Hi Yoann,

I’ve added the two requested python3-py backports in the v2 series:

https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/scarthgap_patch_v2_1_3/121047195

Thanks,
Darsh Kelaiya

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2185 bytes --]