From: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@nvidia.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Shai Malin <smalin@nvidia.com>,
"malin1024@gmail.com" <malin1024@gmail.com>,
Yoray Zack <yorayz@nvidia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
mgurtovoy@nvidia.com, galshalom@nvidia.com, borisp@nvidia.com,
ogerlitz@nvidia.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v25 00/20] nvme-tcp receive offloads
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 18:21:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <253v81vpw4t.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ1PR12MB60759C892F32A1E4F3A36CCEA5C62@SJ1PR12MB6075.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,
We have taken some time to review your documents and code and have had
several internal discussions regarding the CI topic. We truly appreciate
the benefits that a CI setup could bring. However, we believe that since
this feature primarily relies on nvme-tcp, it might achieve better
coverage and testing if integrated with blktest. Your design focuses on
the netdev layer, which we don't think is sufficient.
blktests/nvme is designed to test the entire nvme upstream
infrastructure including nvme-tcp that targets corner cases and bugs in
on-going development. Chaitanya, Shinichiro, Daniel and other
developers are actively developing blktests and running these tests in
timely manner on latest branch in linux-nvme repo and for-next branch in
linux-block repo.
Again, we are open to provide NIC so that others can also test this
feature on upstream kernel on our NIC to facilitate easier testing
including distros, as long as they are testing this feature on upstream
kernel. In this way we don't have to replicate the nvme-block storage
stack infra/tools/tests in the framework that is focused on netdev
development and yet achieve good coverage, what do you think?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 16:00 [PATCH v25 00/20] nvme-tcp receive offloads Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 01/20] net: Introduce direct data placement tcp offload Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 02/20] netlink: add new family to manage ULP_DDP enablement and stats Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 03/20] iov_iter: skip copy if src == dst for direct data placement Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 04/20] net/tls,core: export get_netdev_for_sock Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 05/20] nvme-tcp: Add DDP offload control path Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 06/20] nvme-tcp: Add DDP data-path Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 07/20] nvme-tcp: RX DDGST offload Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 08/20] nvme-tcp: Deal with netdevice DOWN events Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 09/20] Documentation: add ULP DDP offload documentation Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 10/20] net/mlx5e: Rename from tls to transport static params Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 11/20] net/mlx5e: Refactor ico sq polling to get budget Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 12/20] net/mlx5: Add NVMEoTCP caps, HW bits, 128B CQE and enumerations Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 13/20] net/mlx5e: NVMEoTCP, offload initialization Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 14/20] net/mlx5e: TCP flow steering for nvme-tcp acceleration Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 15/20] net/mlx5e: NVMEoTCP, use KLM UMRs for buffer registration Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 16/20] net/mlx5e: NVMEoTCP, queue init/teardown Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 17/20] net/mlx5e: NVMEoTCP, ddp setup and resync Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 18/20] net/mlx5e: NVMEoTCP, async ddp invalidation Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 19/20] net/mlx5e: NVMEoTCP, data-path for DDP+DDGST offload Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v25 20/20] net/mlx5e: NVMEoTCP, statistics Aurelien Aptel
2024-05-31 1:39 ` [PATCH v25 00/20] nvme-tcp receive offloads Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-31 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-03 7:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-10 12:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-10 14:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-11 6:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-11 11:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-15 21:34 ` David Laight
2024-06-10 10:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-10 13:23 ` Aurelien Aptel
2024-06-26 15:21 ` Aurelien Aptel [this message]
2024-06-26 15:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-26 19:34 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-26 19:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-26 20:10 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-26 20:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=253v81vpw4t.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=aaptel@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=galshalom@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=malin1024@gmail.com \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@nvidia.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=smalin@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=yorayz@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.