All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
	mturquette@linaro.org, thomas.abraham@linaro.org,
	dianders@chromium.org, t.figa@samsung.com,
	vikas.sajjan@linaro.org, abrestic@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:05:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2603217.1gvhPdgQES@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370870659-10929-7-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com>

On Monday 10 of June 2013 18:54:18 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> From: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
> 
> While trying to get rate of "mout_vpllsrc" MUX (parent) for registering
> the "fout_vpll" (child), we found get rate was failing.
> 
> So this patch moves the mout_vpllsrc MUX out of the existing common list
> and registers the mout_vpllsrc MUX before the PLL registrations.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c index 21f5491..6881810 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock
> exynos5250_fixed_factor_clks[] __initdata = { FFACTOR(none,
> "fout_bplldiv2", "fout_bpll", 1, 2, 0),
>  };
> 
> +struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks[] __initdata = {
> +	MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
> +};
> +
>  struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>  	MUX(none, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
> @@ -235,7 +239,6 @@ struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[]
> __initdata = { MUX(none, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "mout_bpll_fout", mout_bpll_fout_p, PLL_DIV2_SEL, 0, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_CDREX, 0, 1),
> -	MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 16, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP2, 12, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_cpll", mout_cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1),
> @@ -526,6 +529,8 @@ void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node
> *np) samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks,
> ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks),
>  			ext_clk_match);
> +	samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks,
> +				ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks));
>  	samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos5250_plls, 
ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_plls),
> reg_base);
>  	samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos5250_fixed_rate_clks,

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/7] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:05:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2603217.1gvhPdgQES@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370870659-10929-7-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com>

On Monday 10 of June 2013 18:54:18 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> From: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
> 
> While trying to get rate of "mout_vpllsrc" MUX (parent) for registering
> the "fout_vpll" (child), we found get rate was failing.
> 
> So this patch moves the mout_vpllsrc MUX out of the existing common list
> and registers the mout_vpllsrc MUX before the PLL registrations.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c index 21f5491..6881810 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock
> exynos5250_fixed_factor_clks[] __initdata = { FFACTOR(none,
> "fout_bplldiv2", "fout_bpll", 1, 2, 0),
>  };
> 
> +struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks[] __initdata = {
> +	MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
> +};
> +
>  struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>  	MUX(none, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
> @@ -235,7 +239,6 @@ struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[]
> __initdata = { MUX(none, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "mout_bpll_fout", mout_bpll_fout_p, PLL_DIV2_SEL, 0, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_CDREX, 0, 1),
> -	MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 16, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP2, 12, 1),
>  	MUX(none, "sclk_cpll", mout_cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1),
> @@ -526,6 +529,8 @@ void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node
> *np) samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks,
> ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks),
>  			ext_clk_match);
> +	samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks,
> +				ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks));
>  	samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos5250_plls, 
ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_plls),
> reg_base);
>  	samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos5250_fixed_rate_clks,

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-19 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10 13:24 [PATCH v6 0/7] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24 ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24   ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 17:03   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 17:03     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll() Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24   ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 16:54   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 16:54     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 18:14     ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 18:14       ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 18:21       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 18:21         ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24   ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 17:00   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 17:00     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24   ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 17:02   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 17:02     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24   ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 17:05   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 17:05     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24   ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 17:05   ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-06-19 17:05     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-10 13:24   ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-19 17:13   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-19 17:13     ` Tomasz Figa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2603217.1gvhPdgQES@flatron \
    --to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
    --cc=vikas.sajjan@linaro.org \
    --cc=yadi.brar@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.