All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>,
	pali.rohar@gmail.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 22:04:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2682382.6cA2VZCBS9@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462354045-94455-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Wednesday, May 04, 2016 12:27:25 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Many Intel systems the BIOS declares a SystemIO OpRegion below the SMBus
> PCI device as can be seen in ACPI DSDT table from Lenovo Yoga 900:
> 
>   Device (SBUS)
>   {
>       OperationRegion (SMBI, SystemIO, (SBAR << 0x05), 0x10)
>       Field (SMBI, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
>       {
>           HSTS,   8,
>           Offset (0x02),
>           HCON,   8,
>           HCOM,   8,
>           TXSA,   8,
>           DAT0,   8,
>           DAT1,   8,
>           HBDR,   8,
>           PECR,   8,
>           RXSA,   8,
>           SDAT,   16
>       }
> 
> There are also bunch of AML methods that that the BIOS can use to access
> these fields. Most of the systems in question AML methods accessing the
> SMBI OpRegion are never used.
> 
> Now, because of this SMBI OpRegion many systems fail to load the SMBus
> driver with an error looking like one below:
> 
>   ACPI Warning: SystemIO range 0x0000000000003040-0x000000000000305F
>        conflicts with OpRegion 0x0000000000003040-0x000000000000304F
>        (\_SB.PCI0.SBUS.SMBI) (20160108/utaddress-255)
>   ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use
>        it instead of the native driver
> 
> The reason is that this SMBI OpRegion conflicts with the PCI BAR used by
> the SMBus driver.
> 
> It turns out that we can install a custom SystemIO address space handler
> for the SMBus device to intercept all accesses through that OpRegion. This
> allows us to share the PCI BAR with the AML code if it for some reason is
> using it. We do not expect that this OpRegion handler will ever be called
> but if it is we print a warning and prevent all access from the SMBus
> driver itself.
> 
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Hi,
> 
> This is a second try. The first version of the patch is here:
> 
>   https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616120/
> 
> This version inhibits all further driver access to the SMBus device when
> BIOS first time uses the conflicting OpRegion.
> 
> I've tested this using MinnowBoard MAX with modified DSDT where _STA
> (device status) method tries to read from the OpRegion and it seems to
> work. Below is the modified ASL if someone wants to give it a try:
> 
>   Device (SBUS)
>   {
>       Name (_ADR, 0x001F0003)  // _ADR: Address
>       OperationRegion (SMBP, PCI_Config, 0x40, 0xC0)
>       Field (SMBP, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
>       {
>               ,   2, 
>           I2CE,   1
>       }
> 
>       OperationRegion (SMPB, PCI_Config, 0x20, 0x04)
>       Field (SMPB, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
>       {
>               ,   5, 
>           SBAR,   11
>       }
> 
>       OperationRegion (SMBI, SystemIO, (SBAR << 0x05), 0x10)
>       Field (SMBI, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
>       {
>           HSTS,   8, 
>           Offset (0x02), 
>           HCON,   8, 
>           HCOM,   8, 
>           TXSA,   8, 
>           DAT0,   8, 
>           DAT1,   8, 
>           HBDR,   8, 
>           PECR,   8, 
>           RXSA,   8, 
>           SDAT,   16
>       }
> 
>       Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
>       {
>           Local0 = HSTS
>           Local0 += 1
>           Local1 = SDAT
>           Local1 += 1
>           Return (0xF)
>       }
>   }
> 
> Basically it just does two reads from the OpRegion whenever device status
> is queried. After that accesses to the bus fails:
> 
>   # i2cget -y 9 0xc 0 b
>   Error: Read failed
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> index 5652bf6ce9be..e200cdbd2882 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> @@ -247,6 +247,13 @@ struct i801_priv {
>  	struct platform_device *mux_pdev;
>  #endif
>  	struct platform_device *tco_pdev;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If set to true the host controller registers are reserved for
> +	 * ACPI AML use. Protected by acpi_lock.
> +	 */
> +	bool acpi_reserved;
> +	struct mutex acpi_lock;
>  };
>  
>  #define FEATURE_SMBUS_PEC	(1 << 0)
> @@ -720,6 +727,12 @@ static s32 i801_access(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
>  	int ret = 0, xact = 0;
>  	struct i801_priv *priv = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->acpi_lock);
> +	if (priv->acpi_reserved) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&priv->acpi_lock);
> +		return -EPERM;

I'd return -EIO from here as that's what it looks like from the caller's perspective.

That's not a big deal, though, so

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-04 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-04  9:27 [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR Mika Westerberg
2016-05-04  9:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-04 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-05-06  8:55   ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-06 12:12 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-06 12:20   ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2682382.6cA2VZCBS9@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mario_limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.