From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com"
<jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: ARM: add support for generic PCI host controller
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:17:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2724033.O0vxCdfViQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219110718.GD28173@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 11:07:19 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:10:23PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:46:44PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 18 February 2014 12:20:43 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > + /* Register our I/O and Memory resources */
> > > > + res_valid = 0;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(win, &pci->host.windows, list) {
> > > > + struct resource *parent;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (resource_type(win->res) == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> > > > + parent = &ioport_resource;
> > > > + err = pci_ioremap_io(win->offset, win->res->start);
> > >
> > > and consequently pass the pci_addr rather than the offset here. How about
> > > moving the pci_ioremap_io() call into gen_pci_alloc_io_offset()?
>
> I've probably just confused myself, but passing the pci_addr to
> pci_ioremap_io doesn't make sense to me.
I think the confusion is that there are two different things we call
offset here. The calculation of the offset you pass into
pci_ioremap_io() is correct AFAICT now, but it's not what you are
supposed to pass into pci_add_resource_offset() or what we normally
put into pci_host_bridge_window->offset.
> My understanding is that:
>
> cpu = bus + offset
Right. This would be the case for mem_offset.
> In the case of I/O, the offset is really:
>
> offset = (PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE - bus) + window
I can't seem to make sense of this calculation. PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE
is a pointer to the start of the virtual window. You can add offsets
to the pointer, but subtracting a number from it is not a well-defined
operation.
> where window is determined by the simple allocator I wrote.
And your allocator calls it offset, which is what confused me.
> Now, the __io macro takes care of PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE so we don't actually care
> about that when adding the PCI I/O resources, instead we'll just pass:
>
> offset = window - bus
Yes, this would be the io_offset that you pass into pci_add_resource_offset().
> and then pci_ioremap_io will just want the window offset, since that's added
> directly on to PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE for the ioremap_page_range.
Yes.
> If I call pci_ioremap_io(range->pci_addr, ...) then I'm going to trip a BUG_ON
> unless the pci_addr is within IO_SPACE_LIMIT.
range->pci_addr is what you call 'bus' above. Since you want 'window', you
have to pass 'bus'+'offset', or 'range->pci_addr + io_offset'. Normally, one
of the two would be zero, while the other is equal to 'window'.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: ARM: add support for generic PCI host controller
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:17:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2724033.O0vxCdfViQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219110718.GD28173@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 11:07:19 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:10:23PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:46:44PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 18 February 2014 12:20:43 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > + /* Register our I/O and Memory resources */
> > > > + res_valid = 0;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(win, &pci->host.windows, list) {
> > > > + struct resource *parent;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (resource_type(win->res) == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> > > > + parent = &ioport_resource;
> > > > + err = pci_ioremap_io(win->offset, win->res->start);
> > >
> > > and consequently pass the pci_addr rather than the offset here. How about
> > > moving the pci_ioremap_io() call into gen_pci_alloc_io_offset()?
>
> I've probably just confused myself, but passing the pci_addr to
> pci_ioremap_io doesn't make sense to me.
I think the confusion is that there are two different things we call
offset here. The calculation of the offset you pass into
pci_ioremap_io() is correct AFAICT now, but it's not what you are
supposed to pass into pci_add_resource_offset() or what we normally
put into pci_host_bridge_window->offset.
> My understanding is that:
>
> cpu = bus + offset
Right. This would be the case for mem_offset.
> In the case of I/O, the offset is really:
>
> offset = (PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE - bus) + window
I can't seem to make sense of this calculation. PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE
is a pointer to the start of the virtual window. You can add offsets
to the pointer, but subtracting a number from it is not a well-defined
operation.
> where window is determined by the simple allocator I wrote.
And your allocator calls it offset, which is what confused me.
> Now, the __io macro takes care of PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE so we don't actually care
> about that when adding the PCI I/O resources, instead we'll just pass:
>
> offset = window - bus
Yes, this would be the io_offset that you pass into pci_add_resource_offset().
> and then pci_ioremap_io will just want the window offset, since that's added
> directly on to PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE for the ioremap_page_range.
Yes.
> If I call pci_ioremap_io(range->pci_addr, ...) then I'm going to trip a BUG_ON
> unless the pci_addr is within IO_SPACE_LIMIT.
range->pci_addr is what you call 'bus' above. Since you want 'window', you
have to pass 'bus'+'offset', or 'range->pci_addr + io_offset'. Normally, one
of the two would be zero, while the other is equal to 'window'.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-19 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-18 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: PCI: implement generic PCI host controller Will Deacon
2014-02-18 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: mach-virt: allow PCI support to be selected Will Deacon
2014-02-18 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: bios32: use pci_enable_resource to enable PCI resources Will Deacon
2014-02-18 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 15:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-18 15:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-18 19:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-20 11:12 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-20 11:12 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-20 19:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-20 19:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-21 0:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-21 0:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-21 13:49 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-21 13:49 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: ARM: add support for generic PCI host controller Will Deacon
2014-02-18 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 19:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-19 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-19 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-19 14:17 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-02-19 14:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-19 15:25 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-19 15:25 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-18 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-18 18:44 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 18:44 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 18:51 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 18:51 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 19:16 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:16 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 18:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-18 18:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-18 19:09 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:09 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 19:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 19:36 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:36 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 19:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 20:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 20:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-19 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-19 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-18 20:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 20:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-19 10:54 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-19 10:54 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2724033.O0vxCdfViQ@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.