diff for duplicates of <2738343.ekabfXD0fs@diego> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 212fe2e..5537285 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,49 +1,36 @@ Hi Mike, -Am Freitag, 11. M=E4rz 2016, 08:51:52 schrieb Michael Turquette: +Am Freitag, 11. M?rz 2016, 08:51:52 schrieb Michael Turquette: > Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2016-03-08 23:24:20) > > I have the following clk case which I dunno the elegant solution: -> >=20 -> >=20 -> > cpuclk have two parents: cpupll and refclk. When set the cpuclk fre= -q, we -> > have to set its parent's freq, I.E cpupll freq. But before changing= - the +> > +> > +> > cpuclk have two parents: cpupll and refclk. When set the cpuclk freq, we +> > have to set its parent's freq, I.E cpupll freq. But before changing the > > cpupll's freq, we should set its refclk as its parent firstly. -> >=20 -> > AFAIK, this is a common case, I have seen such requirement in rockc= -hip, -> > samsung clk driver. They solve this by notifier, but as pointed out= - by +> > +> > AFAIK, this is a common case, I have seen such requirement in rockchip, +> > samsung clk driver. They solve this by notifier, but as pointed out by > > Michael in -> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/351= -565.ht +> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/351565.ht > > ml -> >=20 -> > "This is also a hack and it points towards some missing infrastruct= -ure in +> > +> > "This is also a hack and it points towards some missing infrastructure in > > the clock framework." -> >=20 -> > I also don't like the notifier solution, I believe the elegant solu= -tion -> > could be using the coordinated clock infrastructure. So what's the = -status -> > of this infrastructure? I can test, and I can even add some code to= - make +> > +> > I also don't like the notifier solution, I believe the elegant solution +> > could be using the coordinated clock infrastructure. So what's the status +> > of this infrastructure? I can test, and I can even add some code to make > > it be ready to be merged if you guide me ;) ->=20 -> Thanks for the email. I hope to finish that feature before ELC. I hav= -e -> Cc'd Pi-Cheng Chen from Mediatek who is also interested in coordinate= -d +> +> Thanks for the email. I hope to finish that feature before ELC. I have +> Cc'd Pi-Cheng Chen from Mediatek who is also interested in coordinated > clock rates. pulling this up again, did this materialize yet? :-) -Because it looks like on Rockchip we're getting yet another clock that = -needs=20 -special handling (set_rate needs to go through the trusted-firmware, wh= -ile=20 +Because it looks like on Rockchip we're getting yet another clock that needs +special handling (set_rate needs to go through the trusted-firmware, while reading stays the same) which might profit from that as well. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 19e4c5a..afed699 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,66 +1,47 @@ "ref\020160309152420.20de187a@xhacker\0" "ref\020160311165152.4103.82090@quark.deferred.io\0" - "From\0Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [Query]set clk rate must operate its coordinated clock\0" + "From\0heiko@sntech.de (Heiko St\303\274bner)\0" + "Subject\0[Query]set clk rate must operate its coordinated clock\0" "Date\0Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:10:37 +0200\0" - "To\0Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>\0" - "Cc\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>" - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - linux-clk@vger.kernel.org - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> - " pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Mike,\n" "\n" - "Am Freitag, 11. M=E4rz 2016, 08:51:52 schrieb Michael Turquette:\n" + "Am Freitag, 11. M?rz 2016, 08:51:52 schrieb Michael Turquette:\n" "> Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2016-03-08 23:24:20)\n" "> > I have the following clk case which I dunno the elegant solution:\n" - "> >=20\n" - "> >=20\n" - "> > cpuclk have two parents: cpupll and refclk. When set the cpuclk fre=\n" - "q, we\n" - "> > have to set its parent's freq, I.E cpupll freq. But before changing=\n" - " the\n" + "> > \n" + "> > \n" + "> > cpuclk have two parents: cpupll and refclk. When set the cpuclk freq, we\n" + "> > have to set its parent's freq, I.E cpupll freq. But before changing the\n" "> > cpupll's freq, we should set its refclk as its parent firstly.\n" - "> >=20\n" - "> > AFAIK, this is a common case, I have seen such requirement in rockc=\n" - "hip,\n" - "> > samsung clk driver. They solve this by notifier, but as pointed out=\n" - " by\n" + "> > \n" + "> > AFAIK, this is a common case, I have seen such requirement in rockchip,\n" + "> > samsung clk driver. They solve this by notifier, but as pointed out by\n" "> > Michael in\n" - "> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/351=\n" - "565.ht\n" + "> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/351565.ht\n" "> > ml\n" - "> >=20\n" - "> > \"This is also a hack and it points towards some missing infrastruct=\n" - "ure in\n" + "> > \n" + "> > \"This is also a hack and it points towards some missing infrastructure in\n" "> > the clock framework.\"\n" - "> >=20\n" - "> > I also don't like the notifier solution, I believe the elegant solu=\n" - "tion\n" - "> > could be using the coordinated clock infrastructure. So what's the =\n" - "status\n" - "> > of this infrastructure? I can test, and I can even add some code to=\n" - " make\n" + "> > \n" + "> > I also don't like the notifier solution, I believe the elegant solution\n" + "> > could be using the coordinated clock infrastructure. So what's the status\n" + "> > of this infrastructure? I can test, and I can even add some code to make\n" "> > it be ready to be merged if you guide me ;)\n" - ">=20\n" - "> Thanks for the email. I hope to finish that feature before ELC. I hav=\n" - "e\n" - "> Cc'd Pi-Cheng Chen from Mediatek who is also interested in coordinate=\n" - "d\n" + "> \n" + "> Thanks for the email. I hope to finish that feature before ELC. I have\n" + "> Cc'd Pi-Cheng Chen from Mediatek who is also interested in coordinated\n" "> clock rates.\n" "\n" "pulling this up again, did this materialize yet? :-)\n" "\n" - "Because it looks like on Rockchip we're getting yet another clock that =\n" - "needs=20\n" - "special handling (set_rate needs to go through the trusted-firmware, wh=\n" - "ile=20\n" + "Because it looks like on Rockchip we're getting yet another clock that needs \n" + "special handling (set_rate needs to go through the trusted-firmware, while \n" "reading stays the same) which might profit from that as well.\n" "\n" "\n" Heiko -7d45a200ae0385c942165a666d8def7a64f3eff518b3d8df703a277c0651d2ce +5644c2400c13f40befd6ec4714895b6653577db5c488cbd4622b6450fc5cb088
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.