All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: EC: Use a spin lock without disabing  interrupts"
@ 2024-02-22  9:43 Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2024-02-22  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux ACPI; +Cc: LKML, Dieter Mummenschanz

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit eb9299beadbd ("ACPI: EC: Use a spin lock without disabing
interrupts") introduced an unexpected user-visible change in
behavior, which is a significant CPU load increase when the EC
is in use.

This most likely happens due to increased spinlock contention
and so reducing this effect would require a major rework of the
EC driver locking.  There is no time for this in the current
cycle, so revert commit eb9299beadbd.

Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218511
Reported-by: Dieter Mummenschanz <dmummenschanz@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/ec.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index dbdee2924594..02255795b800 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -525,10 +525,12 @@ static void acpi_ec_clear(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 
 static void acpi_ec_enable_event(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	if (acpi_ec_started(ec))
 		__acpi_ec_enable_event(ec);
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 
 	/* Drain additional events if hardware requires that */
 	if (EC_FLAGS_CLEAR_ON_RESUME)
@@ -544,9 +546,11 @@ static void __acpi_ec_flush_work(void)
 
 static void acpi_ec_disable_event(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	__acpi_ec_disable_event(ec);
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * When ec_freeze_events is true, we need to flush events in
@@ -567,9 +571,10 @@ void acpi_ec_flush_work(void)
 
 static bool acpi_ec_guard_event(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	bool guarded;
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	/*
 	 * If firmware SCI_EVT clearing timing is "event", we actually
 	 * don't know when the SCI_EVT will be cleared by firmware after
@@ -585,29 +590,31 @@ static bool acpi_ec_guard_event(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 	guarded = ec_event_clearing == ACPI_EC_EVT_TIMING_EVENT &&
 		ec->event_state != EC_EVENT_READY &&
 		(!ec->curr || ec->curr->command != ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY);
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 	return guarded;
 }
 
 static int ec_transaction_polled(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	if (ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL))
 		ret = 1;
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static int ec_transaction_completed(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	if (ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE))
 		ret = 1;
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -749,6 +756,7 @@ static int ec_guard(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 
 static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int repeat = 5; /* number of command restarts */
 
 	while (repeat--) {
@@ -757,14 +765,14 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 		do {
 			if (!ec_guard(ec))
 				return 0;
-			spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 			advance_transaction(ec, false);
-			spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 		} while (time_before(jiffies, delay));
 		pr_debug("controller reset, restart transaction\n");
-		spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 		start_transaction(ec);
-		spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 	}
 	return -ETIME;
 }
@@ -772,10 +780,11 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec,
 					struct transaction *t)
 {
+	unsigned long tmp;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/* start transaction */
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp);
 	/* Enable GPE for command processing (IBF=0/OBF=1) */
 	if (!acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(ec)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -786,11 +795,11 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec,
 	ec->curr = t;
 	ec_dbg_req("Command(%s) started", acpi_ec_cmd_string(t->command));
 	start_transaction(ec);
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, tmp);
 
 	ret = ec_poll(ec);
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp);
 	if (t->irq_count == ec_storm_threshold)
 		acpi_ec_unmask_events(ec);
 	ec_dbg_req("Command(%s) stopped", acpi_ec_cmd_string(t->command));
@@ -799,7 +808,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec,
 	acpi_ec_complete_request(ec);
 	ec_dbg_ref(ec, "Decrease command");
 unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, tmp);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -927,7 +936,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ec_get_handle);
 
 static void acpi_ec_start(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool resuming)
 {
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	if (!test_and_set_bit(EC_FLAGS_STARTED, &ec->flags)) {
 		ec_dbg_drv("Starting EC");
 		/* Enable GPE for event processing (SCI_EVT=1) */
@@ -937,28 +948,31 @@ static void acpi_ec_start(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool resuming)
 		}
 		ec_log_drv("EC started");
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static bool acpi_ec_stopped(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	bool flushed;
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	flushed = acpi_ec_flushed(ec);
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 	return flushed;
 }
 
 static void acpi_ec_stop(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool suspending)
 {
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	if (acpi_ec_started(ec)) {
 		ec_dbg_drv("Stopping EC");
 		set_bit(EC_FLAGS_STOPPED, &ec->flags);
-		spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 		wait_event(ec->wait, acpi_ec_stopped(ec));
-		spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 		/* Disable GPE for event processing (SCI_EVT=1) */
 		if (!suspending) {
 			acpi_ec_complete_request(ec);
@@ -969,25 +983,29 @@ static void acpi_ec_stop(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool suspending)
 		clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_STOPPED, &ec->flags);
 		ec_log_drv("EC stopped");
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void acpi_ec_enter_noirq(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	ec->busy_polling = true;
 	ec->polling_guard = 0;
 	ec_log_drv("interrupt blocked");
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void acpi_ec_leave_noirq(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 	ec->busy_polling = ec_busy_polling;
 	ec->polling_guard = ec_polling_guard;
 	ec_log_drv("interrupt unblocked");
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 }
 
 void acpi_ec_block_transactions(void)
@@ -1119,9 +1137,9 @@ static void acpi_ec_event_processor(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) stopped", handler->query_bit);
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&ec->lock);
 	ec->queries_in_progress--;
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 	acpi_ec_put_query_handler(handler);
 	kfree(q);
@@ -1184,12 +1202,12 @@ static int acpi_ec_submit_query(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 	 */
 	ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) scheduled", value);
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 	ec->queries_in_progress++;
 	queue_work(ec_query_wq, &q->work);
 
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -1205,14 +1223,14 @@ static void acpi_ec_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	ec_dbg_evt("Event started");
 
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 	while (ec->events_to_process) {
-		spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 		acpi_ec_submit_query(ec);
 
-		spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 		ec->events_to_process--;
 	}
@@ -1229,11 +1247,11 @@ static void acpi_ec_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 
 		ec_dbg_evt("Event stopped");
 
-		spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 		guard_timeout = !!ec_guard(ec);
 
-		spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(&ec->lock);
 
 		/* Take care of SCI_EVT unless someone else is doing that. */
 		if (guard_timeout && !ec->curr)
@@ -1246,7 +1264,7 @@ static void acpi_ec_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	ec->events_in_progress--;
 
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ec->lock);
 }
 
 static void clear_gpe_and_advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt)
@@ -1271,11 +1289,13 @@ static void clear_gpe_and_advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt
 
 static void acpi_ec_handle_interrupt(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
-	spin_lock(&ec->lock);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 
 	clear_gpe_and_advance_transaction(ec, true);
 
-	spin_unlock(&ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device,
@@ -2085,7 +2105,7 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void)
 	 * Dispatch the EC GPE in-band, but do not report wakeup in any case
 	 * to allow the caller to process events properly after that.
 	 */
-	spin_lock(&first_ec->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&first_ec->lock);
 
 	if (acpi_ec_gpe_status_set(first_ec)) {
 		pm_pr_dbg("ACPI EC GPE status set\n");
@@ -2094,7 +2114,7 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void)
 		work_in_progress = acpi_ec_work_in_progress(first_ec);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&first_ec->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&first_ec->lock);
 
 	if (!work_in_progress)
 		return false;
@@ -2107,11 +2127,11 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void)
 
 		pm_pr_dbg("ACPI EC work flushed\n");
 
-		spin_lock(&first_ec->lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(&first_ec->lock);
 
 		work_in_progress = acpi_ec_work_in_progress(first_ec);
 
-		spin_unlock(&first_ec->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&first_ec->lock);
 	} while (work_in_progress && !pm_wakeup_pending());
 
 	return false;
-- 
2.35.3





^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-02-22  9:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-22  9:43 [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: EC: Use a spin lock without disabing interrupts" Rafael J. Wysocki

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.