From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de>,
Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:06:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2758726.eYgiA1VjUp@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a0c51bd-4245-92e2-566b-cc3dbcc26a84@gmail.com>
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2016, 07:57:08 CET schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
> On 2016-11-16 06:04, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2016, 16:00:31 CET schrieb Roman Mamedov:
> >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:55:32 +0100
> >>
> >> Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de> wrote:
[…]
> > As there seems to be no force option to override the limitation and I
> > do not feel like compiling my own btrfs-tools right now, I will use rsync
> > instead.
>
> In a case like this, I'd trust rsync more than send/receive. The
> following rsync switches might also be of interest:
> -a: This turns on a bunch of things almost everyone wants when using
> rsync, similar to the same switch for cp, just with even more added in.
> -H: This recreates hardlinks on the receiving end.
> -S: This recreates sparse files.
> -A: This copies POSIX ACL's
> -X: This copies extended attributes (most of them at least, there are a
> few that can't be arbitrarily written to).
> Pre-creating the subvolumes by hand combined with using all of those
> will get you almost everything covered by send/receive except for
> sharing of extents and ctime.
I usually use rsync -aAHXSP already :).
I was able to rsync any relevant data of the disk which is now being deleted
by shred command.
Thank you,
--
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 10:25 degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0 Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 10:43 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-16 10:55 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 11:00 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-16 11:04 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:57 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-11-16 17:06 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2016-11-17 20:05 ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-17 20:20 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-11-19 20:27 ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-20 11:58 ` Niccolò Belli
2016-11-17 20:46 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 11:18 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:48 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-22 9:31 g6094199
2017-08-22 10:28 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2017-08-23 13:12 g6094199
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2758726.eYgiA1VjUp@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.steigerwald@teamix.de \
--cc=rm@romanrm.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.