All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, Martin <martin@lichtvoll.de>
Subject: Re: degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:55:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3374757.aMVjisyVFB@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161116154336.543a326b@natsu>

Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2016, 15:43:36 CET schrieb Roman Mamedov:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:25:00 +0100
> 
> Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de> wrote:
> >     merkaba:~> mount -o degraded,clear_cache /dev/satafp1/backup /mnt/zeit
> >     mount: Falscher Dateisystemtyp, ungültige Optionen, der
> >     Superblock von /dev/mapper/satafp1-backup ist beschädigt, fehlende
> >     Kodierungsseite oder ein anderer Fehler
> >     
> >           Manchmal liefert das Systemprotokoll wertvolle Informationen –
> >           versuchen Sie  dmesg | tail  oder ähnlich
> >     
> >     merkaba:~#32> dmesg | tail -6
> >     [ 3080.120687] BTRFS info (device dm-13): allowing degraded mounts
> >     [ 3080.120699] BTRFS info (device dm-13): force clearing of disk cache
> >     [ 3080.120703] BTRFS info (device dm-13): disk space caching is
> >     enabled
> >     [ 3080.120706] BTRFS info (device dm-13): has skinny extents
> >     [ 3080.150957] BTRFS warning (device dm-13): missing devices (1)
> >     exceeds the limit (0), writeable mount is not allowed
> >     [ 3080.195941] BTRFS: open_ctree failed
> 
> I have to wonder did you read the above message? What you need at this point
> is simply "-o degraded,ro". But I don't see that tried anywhere down the
> line.
> 
> See also (or try): https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9419189/

Actually I read that one, but I read more into it than what it was saying:

I read into it that BTRFS would automatically use a read only mount.


merkaba:~> mount -o degraded,ro /dev/satafp1/daten /mnt/zeit

actually really works. *Thank you*, Roman.


I do think that above kernel messages invite such a kind of interpretation
tough. I took the "BTRFS: open_ctree failed" message as indicative to some
structural issue with the filesystem.


So mounting work although for some reason scrubbing is aborted (I had this
issue a long time ago on my laptop as well). After removing /var/lib/btrfs 
scrub status file for the filesystem:

    merkaba:~> btrfs scrub start /mnt/zeit
    scrub started on /mnt/zeit, fsid […] (pid=9054)
    merkaba:~> btrfs scrub status /mnt/zeit
    scrub status for […]
            scrub started at Wed Nov 16 11:52:56 2016 and was aborted after 
00:00:00
            total bytes scrubbed: 0.00B with 0 errors

Anyway, I will now just rsync off the files.

Interestingly enough btrfs restore complained about looping over certain
files… lets see whether the rsync or btrfs send/receive proceeds through.

Ciao,

-- 
Martin Steigerwald  | Trainer

teamix GmbH
Südwestpark 43
90449 Nürnberg

Tel.:  +49 911 30999 55 | Fax: +49 911 30999 99
mail: martin.steigerwald@teamix.de | web:  http://www.teamix.de | blog: http://blog.teamix.de

Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 | Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller

teamix Support Hotline: +49 911 30999-112
 
 *** Bitte liken Sie uns auf Facebook: facebook.com/teamix ***


  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-16 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16 10:25 degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0 Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 10:43 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-16 10:55   ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2016-11-16 11:00     ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-16 11:04       ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:57         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-11-16 17:06           ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-17 20:05             ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-17 20:20               ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-11-19 20:27                 ` Chris Murphy
2016-11-20 11:58                 ` Niccolò Belli
2016-11-17 20:46               ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 11:18     ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-11-16 12:48     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-22  9:31 g6094199
2017-08-22 10:28 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2017-08-23 13:12 g6094199

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3374757.aMVjisyVFB@merkaba \
    --to=martin.steigerwald@teamix.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.