From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core-image-basic.bb: Allow user extensions
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:42:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2838372.Sev3eZbt1S@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52712859.6070002@mlbassoc.com>
On Wednesday 30 October 2013 09:40:09 Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-10-30 09:33, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 October 2013 08:55:09 Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> On 2013-10-30 08:47, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 30 October 2013 08:22:35 Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>>> Allow the user to provide additional packages to this image.
> >>>> This lets core-image-basic behave like all other core-image*
> >>>> recipes (which do support CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL), as well
> >>>> as match the documentation which suggests this as the mode to
> >>>> extend any core-image* image.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb | 3 +++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
> >>>> b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb index
> >>>> 091f57d..e393a28
> >>>> 100644
> >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
> >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-basic.bb
> >>>> @@ -3,9 +3,12 @@ functionality installed."
> >>>>
> >>>> IMAGE_FEATURES += "splash ssh-server-openssh"
> >>>>
> >>>> +CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL ?= ""
> >>>>
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Not sure if it's my mail client but the above looks slightly mangled; in
> >>> any case the above addition shouldn't be needed because
> >>> core-image.bbclass already does this.
> >>
> >> Are you sure it counts? core-image.bbclass is included after this would
> >> be evaluated, or does that not matter?
> >
> > It doesn't matter in most cases, because the value won't actually be
> > expanded until later. Values aren't expanded unless you use immediate
> > expansion (the := operator) or you d.getVar("SOMEVAR", True) is called
> > from python code to return the expanded value.
>
> Understood, thanks.
>
> Should I send another patch with that line removed?
Yes please.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-30 14:22 [PATCH] core-image-basic.bb: Allow user extensions Gary Thomas
2013-10-30 14:47 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-10-30 14:55 ` Gary Thomas
2013-10-30 15:33 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-10-30 15:40 ` Gary Thomas
2013-10-30 15:42 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2838372.Sev3eZbt1S@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.