[meta-gnome][PATCH 0/2] Remove some recipes that are in OE-Core (cover letter only)

[meta-gnome][PATCH 0/2] Remove some recipes that are in OE-Core (cover letter only)

[Paul Eggleton]

In case you're wondering why I've only sent the cover letter for just two
patches, I tried sending them as normal and what I got was:

fatal: pull-29844/0001-hicolor-icon-theme-remove.patch: 29: patch contains a line longer than 998 characters
warning: no patches were sent

They are just deletes though so they don't contain much in the way of
substance.


The following changes since commit a45830a39bb47a9eab27980d52966226c9504ea4:

  recipes: Unify indentation (2013-04-15 16:23:17 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded-contrib paule/meta-gnome
  http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/meta-openembedded-contrib/log/?h=paule/meta-gnome

Paul Eggleton (2):
  hicolor-icon-theme: remove
  libical: remove

 .../hicolor-icon-theme/files/index.theme           | 1731 --------------------
 .../hicolor-icon-theme/hicolor-icon-theme_0.12.bb  |   23 -
 .../libical/files/pthread-fix.patch                |   52 -
 meta-gnome/recipes-support/libical/libical_0.48.bb |   17 -
 4 files changed, 1823 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/hicolor-icon-theme/files/index.theme
 delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/hicolor-icon-theme/hicolor-icon-theme_0.12.bb
 delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-support/libical/files/pthread-fix.patch
 delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-support/libical/libical_0.48.bb

-- 
1.7.10.4

Re: [meta-gnome][PATCH 0/2] Remove some recipes that are in OE-Core (cover letter only)

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2385 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:46:48PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> In case you're wondering why I've only sent the cover letter for just two
> patches, I tried sending them as normal and what I got was:
> 
> fatal: pull-29844/0001-hicolor-icon-theme-remove.patch: 29: patch contains a line longer than 998 characters
> warning: no patches were sent
> 
> They are just deletes though so they don't contain much in the way of
> substance.

libical is fine and I'll merge it shortly, but hicolor-icon-theme needs
PR bump in oe-core first (and in oe-core/dylan if you want it merged in
meta-oe before branching dylan).


--- meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/hicolor-icon-theme/hicolor-icon-theme_0.12.bb
2013-04-15 16:56:22.777983546 +0200
+++ ../openembedded-core/meta/recipes-gnome/hicolor-icon-theme/hicolor-icon-theme_0.12.bb
2013-04-11 17:22:28.077085198 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
 SECTION = "unknown"
 inherit gnome allarch
 
-PR = "r1"
+DEPENDS = ""
+
+PR = "r0"


> 
> 
> The following changes since commit a45830a39bb47a9eab27980d52966226c9504ea4:
> 
>   recipes: Unify indentation (2013-04-15 16:23:17 +0200)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded-contrib paule/meta-gnome
>   http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/meta-openembedded-contrib/log/?h=paule/meta-gnome
> 
> Paul Eggleton (2):
>   hicolor-icon-theme: remove
>   libical: remove
> 
>  .../hicolor-icon-theme/files/index.theme           | 1731 --------------------
>  .../hicolor-icon-theme/hicolor-icon-theme_0.12.bb  |   23 -
>  .../libical/files/pthread-fix.patch                |   52 -
>  meta-gnome/recipes-support/libical/libical_0.48.bb |   17 -
>  4 files changed, 1823 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/hicolor-icon-theme/files/index.theme
>  delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/hicolor-icon-theme/hicolor-icon-theme_0.12.bb
>  delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-support/libical/files/pthread-fix.patch
>  delete mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-support/libical/libical_0.48.bb
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [meta-gnome][PATCH 0/2] Remove some recipes that are in OE-Core (cover letter only)

[Paul Eggleton]

On Tuesday 16 April 2013 16:05:01 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:46:48PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > In case you're wondering why I've only sent the cover letter for just two
> > patches, I tried sending them as normal and what I got was:
> > 
> > fatal: pull-29844/0001-hicolor-icon-theme-remove.patch: 29: patch contains
> > a line longer than 998 characters warning: no patches were sent
> > 
> > They are just deletes though so they don't contain much in the way of
> > substance.
> 
> libical is fine and I'll merge it shortly, but hicolor-icon-theme needs
> PR bump in oe-core first (and in oe-core/dylan if you want it merged in
> meta-oe before branching dylan).

If you'll accept an OE-Core PR bump for this can we do the same for the 
bbappends that are preserved solely for keeping the same PR?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [meta-gnome][PATCH 0/2] Remove some recipes that are in OE-Core (cover letter only)

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1376 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 03:11:11PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 April 2013 16:05:01 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:46:48PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > In case you're wondering why I've only sent the cover letter for just two
> > > patches, I tried sending them as normal and what I got was:
> > > 
> > > fatal: pull-29844/0001-hicolor-icon-theme-remove.patch: 29: patch contains
> > > a line longer than 998 characters warning: no patches were sent
> > > 
> > > They are just deletes though so they don't contain much in the way of
> > > substance.
> > 
> > libical is fine and I'll merge it shortly, but hicolor-icon-theme needs
> > PR bump in oe-core first (and in oe-core/dylan if you want it merged in
> > meta-oe before branching dylan).
> 
> If you'll accept an OE-Core PR bump for this can we do the same for the 
> bbappends that are preserved solely for keeping the same PR?

bbappens are a bit different, because this PR bump (would be nice to do
+2) does not need to happen atomically with meta-oe bb removal.

With bbappends it's possible that someone will upgrade oe-core with PR
bumps, build qt4-x11-free and then upgrade meta-oe without PRINCs and
build qt4-x11-free. But I'm willing to take that risk if we apply both
"close" :).

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]