All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: huangtao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	xxx-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	zyw-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	jay.xu-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rockchip: power-domain: make idle handling optional
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:05:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <291170080.OevJ1dsWVH@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455764838-12928-2-git-send-email-zhangqing-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>

Am Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016, 11:07:13 schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> Not all new socs need to handle idle states on domain state changes,
> so add the possibility to make them optional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>

What's up with the Signed-off-bys? I remember creating the draft of this 
change, so either my authorship of the patch should be retained or the 
Signed-off-by with my name removed :-)

git send-email will keep patch authorship nicely.


> ---
>  drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c index 6cdffb1..3dcc611 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> @@ -63,14 +63,16 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
>  };
> 
>  #define to_rockchip_pd(gpd) container_of(gpd, struct rockchip_pm_domain,
> genpd) +#define NULL_BIT		-32
> +#define OVERFLOW_MASK		32

I don't really understand why you need this NULL_BIT / OVERFLOW_MASK.
Defining the unset things to -1 should work nicely as well and is already 
regularly used elsewhere - so people will already know this scheme. That way 
you also don't need to introduce two new constants someone will have to look 
up later.

> 
>  #define DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, idle, ack)	\
>  {						\
>  	.pwr_mask = BIT(pwr),			\
>  	.status_mask = BIT(status),		\
> -	.req_mask = BIT(req),			\
> -	.idle_mask = BIT(idle),			\
> -	.ack_mask = BIT(ack),			\
> +	.req_mask = (req >= 0) ? BIT(req) : OVERFLOW_MASK,		\
> +	.idle_mask = (idle >= 0) ? BIT(idle) : OVERFLOW_MASK,	\
> +	.ack_mask = (ack >= 0) ? BIT(ack) : OVERFLOW_MASK,		\
>  }
> 
>  #define DOMAIN_RK3288(pwr, status, req)		\
> @@ -96,6 +98,9 @@ static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct
> rockchip_pm_domain *pd, struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
>  	unsigned int val;
> 
> +	if (pd_info->req_mask >= OVERFLOW_MASK)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	regmap_update_bits(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->req_offset,
>  			   pd_info->req_mask, idle ? -1U : 0);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] rockchip: power-domain: make idle handling optional
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:05:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <291170080.OevJ1dsWVH@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455764838-12928-2-git-send-email-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>

Am Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016, 11:07:13 schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> Not all new socs need to handle idle states on domain state changes,
> so add the possibility to make them optional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

What's up with the Signed-off-bys? I remember creating the draft of this 
change, so either my authorship of the patch should be retained or the 
Signed-off-by with my name removed :-)

git send-email will keep patch authorship nicely.


> ---
>  drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c index 6cdffb1..3dcc611 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> @@ -63,14 +63,16 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
>  };
> 
>  #define to_rockchip_pd(gpd) container_of(gpd, struct rockchip_pm_domain,
> genpd) +#define NULL_BIT		-32
> +#define OVERFLOW_MASK		32

I don't really understand why you need this NULL_BIT / OVERFLOW_MASK.
Defining the unset things to -1 should work nicely as well and is already 
regularly used elsewhere - so people will already know this scheme. That way 
you also don't need to introduce two new constants someone will have to look 
up later.

> 
>  #define DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, idle, ack)	\
>  {						\
>  	.pwr_mask = BIT(pwr),			\
>  	.status_mask = BIT(status),		\
> -	.req_mask = BIT(req),			\
> -	.idle_mask = BIT(idle),			\
> -	.ack_mask = BIT(ack),			\
> +	.req_mask = (req >= 0) ? BIT(req) : OVERFLOW_MASK,		\
> +	.idle_mask = (idle >= 0) ? BIT(idle) : OVERFLOW_MASK,	\
> +	.ack_mask = (ack >= 0) ? BIT(ack) : OVERFLOW_MASK,		\
>  }
> 
>  #define DOMAIN_RK3288(pwr, status, req)		\
> @@ -96,6 +98,9 @@ static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct
> rockchip_pm_domain *pd, struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
>  	unsigned int val;
> 
> +	if (pd_info->req_mask >= OVERFLOW_MASK)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	regmap_update_bits(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->req_offset,
>  			   pd_info->req_mask, idle ? -1U : 0);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Cc: wxt@rock-chips.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	huangtao@rock-chips.com, zyw@rock-chips.com, xxx@rock-chips.com,
	jay.xu@rock-chips.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rockchip: power-domain: make idle handling optional
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:05:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <291170080.OevJ1dsWVH@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455764838-12928-2-git-send-email-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>

Am Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016, 11:07:13 schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> Not all new socs need to handle idle states on domain state changes,
> so add the possibility to make them optional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

What's up with the Signed-off-bys? I remember creating the draft of this 
change, so either my authorship of the patch should be retained or the 
Signed-off-by with my name removed :-)

git send-email will keep patch authorship nicely.


> ---
>  drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c index 6cdffb1..3dcc611 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> @@ -63,14 +63,16 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
>  };
> 
>  #define to_rockchip_pd(gpd) container_of(gpd, struct rockchip_pm_domain,
> genpd) +#define NULL_BIT		-32
> +#define OVERFLOW_MASK		32

I don't really understand why you need this NULL_BIT / OVERFLOW_MASK.
Defining the unset things to -1 should work nicely as well and is already 
regularly used elsewhere - so people will already know this scheme. That way 
you also don't need to introduce two new constants someone will have to look 
up later.

> 
>  #define DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, idle, ack)	\
>  {						\
>  	.pwr_mask = BIT(pwr),			\
>  	.status_mask = BIT(status),		\
> -	.req_mask = BIT(req),			\
> -	.idle_mask = BIT(idle),			\
> -	.ack_mask = BIT(ack),			\
> +	.req_mask = (req >= 0) ? BIT(req) : OVERFLOW_MASK,		\
> +	.idle_mask = (idle >= 0) ? BIT(idle) : OVERFLOW_MASK,	\
> +	.ack_mask = (ack >= 0) ? BIT(ack) : OVERFLOW_MASK,		\
>  }
> 
>  #define DOMAIN_RK3288(pwr, status, req)		\
> @@ -96,6 +98,9 @@ static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct
> rockchip_pm_domain *pd, struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
>  	unsigned int val;
> 
> +	if (pd_info->req_mask >= OVERFLOW_MASK)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	regmap_update_bits(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->req_offset,
>  			   pd_info->req_mask, idle ? -1U : 0);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-19  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-18  3:07 [PATCH v2 0/6] rockchip: power-domain: fix pm domain for support RK3399 SoC Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07 ` Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07 ` Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] rockchip: power-domain: make idle handling optional Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07   ` Elaine Zhang
     [not found]   ` <1455764838-12928-2-git-send-email-zhangqing-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-19  0:05     ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2016-02-19  0:05       ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-02-19  0:05       ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-02-18  3:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] rockchip: power-domain: allow domains only handling idle requests Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07   ` Elaine Zhang
     [not found] ` <1455764838-12928-1-git-send-email-zhangqing-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-18  3:07   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07     ` Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07     ` Elaine Zhang
2016-02-19  0:20     ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-02-19  0:20       ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-03  0:05       ` Kevin Hilman
2016-03-03  0:05         ` Kevin Hilman
2016-02-18  3:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] dt/bindings: power: add RK3399 SoCs header for power-domain Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18  3:07   ` Elaine Zhang
2016-02-18 23:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] rockchip: power-domain: fix pm domain for support RK3399 SoC Heiko Stuebner
2016-02-18 23:48   ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=291170080.OevJ1dsWVH@phil \
    --to=heiko-4mtyjxux2i+zqb+pc5nmwq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=huangtao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jay.xu-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=xxx-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=zhangqing-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=zyw-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.