All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <jasonuhl@sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	holt@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 + free_hot_zeroed_page + free_cold_zeroed page
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 05:43:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29495f1d050317214315f6da3d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503171808540.11258@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:09:11 -0800 (PST), Christoph Lameter
<clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jason Uhlenkott wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:36:50PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > +        while (avenrun[0] >= ((unsigned long)sysctl_scrub_load << FSHIFT)) {
> > > +           set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > +           schedule_timeout(30*HZ);
> > > +   }
> >
> > This should probably be TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE.  It'll never actually get
> > interrupted either way since kernel threads block all signals, but
> > sleeping uninterruptibly contributes to the load average.
> 
> Correct. .... I just do not seem to be able to get this right.

I think msleep_interruptible(30000) would be your best choice, then. 
Maybe with a comment that you don't actually expect signals, but are
using TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to avoid contributing to load average (that
way, if the loadavg calculation changes someday, somebody will be able
to change your sleep over appropriately).

Thanks,
Nish

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <jasonuhl@sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	holt@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 + free_hot_zeroed_page + free_cold_zeroed page
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:43:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29495f1d050317214315f6da3d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503171808540.11258@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:09:11 -0800 (PST), Christoph Lameter
<clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jason Uhlenkott wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:36:50PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > +        while (avenrun[0] >= ((unsigned long)sysctl_scrub_load << FSHIFT)) {
> > > +           set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > +           schedule_timeout(30*HZ);
> > > +   }
> >
> > This should probably be TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE.  It'll never actually get
> > interrupted either way since kernel threads block all signals, but
> > sleeping uninterruptibly contributes to the load average.
> 
> Correct. .... I just do not seem to be able to get this right.

I think msleep_interruptible(30000) would be your best choice, then. 
Maybe with a comment that you don't actually expect signals, but are
using TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to avoid contributing to load average (that
way, if the loadavg calculation changes someday, somebody will be able
to change your sleep over appropriately).

Thanks,
Nish

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-18  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-17 21:43 [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 Christoph Lameter
2005-03-17 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-17 22:31   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-17 23:11     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-17 23:24       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-17 23:52         ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18  0:00           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-17 23:26       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-17 23:59         ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18  0:04           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-18  0:17             ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18  0:29               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-18  1:36   ` [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 + free_hot_zeroed_page + free_cold_zeroed Christoph Lameter
2005-03-18  1:36     ` [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 + free_hot_zeroed_page + free_cold_zeroed page Christoph Lameter
2005-03-18  2:06     ` Jason Uhlenkott
2005-03-18  2:06       ` Jason Uhlenkott
2005-03-18  2:09       ` [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 + free_hot_zeroed_page + free_cold_zeroed Christoph Lameter
2005-03-18  2:09         ` [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 + free_hot_zeroed_page + free_cold_zeroed page Christoph Lameter
2005-03-18  5:43         ` Nish Aravamudan [this message]
2005-03-18  5:43           ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-03-17 22:59 ` [PATCH] Prezeroing V8 Nish Aravamudan
2005-03-17 23:06   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-18  3:14     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-25  1:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-25 12:28   ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-03-29  1:50   ` [PATCH] " Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29495f1d050317214315f6da3d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=jasonuhl@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.