* Re: [linux-lvm] naming conventions of vgcfg-backups?
@ 2001-08-21 12:42 Lars Grobe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lars Grobe @ 2001-08-21 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
Hi!
It was the right guess, or at least it seams to be ok now. I did a restore,
and at the moment, reiserfs is checking the filesystem. I will report
everything to the people at namesys, so it will be documented for the next one
interrupting a resize process...
CU, Lars.
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 233 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [linux-lvm] naming conventions of vgcfg-backups?
@ 2001-08-21 12:01 Lars Grobe
2001-08-21 12:13 ` AJ Lewis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lars Grobe @ 2001-08-21 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Hi!
After resizing, I have to restore my previous lvm configuration. I'm just
not sure about the default naming of the backups?
Am I right that <vgname>.conf is the current config (which is in use now -
and which is wrong), while <vgname>.conf.1.old is the previous (which I have
to restore) and <vgname>.[2345].old are the older backups?
CU, Lars.
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] naming conventions of vgcfg-backups?
2001-08-21 12:01 Lars Grobe
@ 2001-08-21 12:13 ` AJ Lewis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: AJ Lewis @ 2001-08-21 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1321 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 02:01:05PM +0200, Lars Grobe wrote:
> After resizing, I have to restore my previous lvm configuration. I'm just
> not sure about the default naming of the backups?
>
> Am I right that <vgname>.conf is the current config (which is in use now -
> and which is wrong), while <vgname>.conf.1.old is the previous (which I have
> to restore) and <vgname>.[2345].old are the older backups?
That should be correct I believe, but you could probably take a look at the
timestamp on the file to verify when it was created. Depending upon which
tools you've used, the first couple might be with the current config or a
variant.
--
AJ Lewis
Sistina Software Inc. Voice: 612-638-0500
1313 5th St SE, Suite 111 Fax: 612-638-0500
Minneapolis, MN 55414 E-Mail: lewis@sistina.com
http://www.sistina.com
Current GPG fingerprint = 3B5F 6011 5216 76A5 2F6B 52A0 941E 1261 0029 2648
Get my key at: http://www.sistina.com/~lewis/gpgkey
(Unfortunately, the PKS-type keyservers do not work with multiple sub-keys)
-----Begin Obligatory Humorous Quote----------------------------------------
A bad random number generator: 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4.33e+67, 1, 1, 1...
-----End Obligatory Humorous Quote------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-21 12:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-21 12:42 [linux-lvm] naming conventions of vgcfg-backups? Lars Grobe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-21 12:01 Lars Grobe
2001-08-21 12:13 ` AJ Lewis
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.