From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] msm: Secure Channel Manager (SCM) support
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29863.1291665648@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:16:14 PST." <1291619778-30289-2-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 517 bytes --]
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:16:14 PST, Jeff Ohlstein said:
> SCM is the protocol used to communicate between the secure and
> non-secure code executing on the applications processor.
Does the presence of SCM hardware imply SMP? From reading this, it's unclear
why the dependence on SMP - it looks like scm.c is something that hardware that
has one ARM processor and a 'secure processor' would still want. Or is the
'secure processor' just another (arbitrarily labeled) ARM CPU participating
as a full SMP processor?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] msm: Secure Channel Manager (SCM) support
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29863.1291665648@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:16:14 PST." <1291619778-30289-2-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org>
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:16:14 PST, Jeff Ohlstein said:
> SCM is the protocol used to communicate between the secure and
> non-secure code executing on the applications processor.
Does the presence of SCM hardware imply SMP? From reading this, it's unclear
why the dependence on SMP - it looks like scm.c is something that hardware that
has one ARM processor and a 'secure processor' would still want. Or is the
'secure processor' just another (arbitrarily labeled) ARM CPU participating
as a full SMP processor?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20101206/de2939f6/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-06 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-06 7:16 [PATCH 0/5] SMP support for msm Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] msm: Secure Channel Manager (SCM) support Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 20:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2010-12-06 20:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2010-12-06 20:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-06 20:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-15 7:48 ` Pavel Machek
2010-12-15 7:48 ` Pavel Machek
2010-12-15 14:05 ` David Brown
2010-12-15 14:05 ` David Brown
2010-12-15 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-15 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-06 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] msm: scm-boot: Support for setting cold/warm boot addresses Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] msm: timer: SMP timer support for msm Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 9:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-06 9:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-06 10:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-06 10:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-06 11:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-06 11:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-07 4:49 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-07 4:49 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-07 8:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-07 8:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-20 12:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-20 12:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-06 7:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] msm: hotplug: support cpu hotplug on msm Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] msm: add SMP support for msm Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
2010-12-06 7:16 ` Jeff Ohlstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29863.1291665648@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=johlstei@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.