All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)" <Chun-Jen.Tseng@mediatek.com>
To: "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "cw00.choi@samsung.com" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	"myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kyungmin.park@samsung.com" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: using global lock avoid race condition
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 05:32:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a73b5ca35692c8ffa68c9ff0df73e24a592967d.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321045624.mwm2mnkqeow5uids@vireshk-i7>

Hi viresh,

I add a global lock related to the CCI driver.

This is because the CCI needs to obtain the frequencies of policy-0 and
policy-6 to determine its own frequency.

If policy-0 and policy-6 are set simultaneously, it may cause the CCI
to select the wrong frequency.

Therefore, I hope to change the setting flow to the following:
   policy-0 or policy-6 -> set frequency -> CCI receives notification -
> set CCI frequency

BRs,

Mark Tseng

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 10:26 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On 20-03-25, 08:22, Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁) wrote:
> > The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info instance is per-policy and the
> > reg_lock is
> > also in this structure. when I have two "policy-0" and "policy-6"
> > use
> > the same mtk_cpufreq_set_target() function but the info->reg_lock
> > is from 2 instance(policy-0 and policy-6). when the policy-0 and
> > policy-6 call set_target target, the mutex_lock is locked by per-
> > policy. So, I change to global lock avoid per-policy lock.
> 
> Yes, that's what you are doing. I am asking why a global lock is
> required here ?
> I think the per-policy lock is all you need.
> 
> --
> viresh


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21  5:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14  7:43 [PATCH v3 0/3] fixed mediatek-cpufreq has multi policy concurrency issue Mark Tseng
2025-02-14  7:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: using global lock avoid race condition Mark Tseng
2025-02-19  5:42   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-20  8:22     ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-03-21  4:56       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-21  5:32         ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁) [this message]
2025-03-21  6:01           ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-24  3:21             ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-03-24  5:43               ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-14  8:42                 ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-04-16  8:05                   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-28 13:26                     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-08-29  5:47                       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-02-19  7:23   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-20  8:25     ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-02-14  7:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cpufreq: mediatek: Add CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag Mark Tseng
2025-02-19  5:45   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-20  8:34     ` Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)
2025-03-21  4:59       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-02-14  7:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpufreq: mediatek: data safety protect Mark Tseng
2025-02-19  5:49   ` Viresh Kumar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-19  0:38 [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: using global lock avoid race condition kernel test robot
2025-02-22 10:39 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a73b5ca35692c8ffa68c9ff0df73e24a592967d.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=chun-jen.tseng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.