Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: using global lock avoid race condition

["Chun-Jen Tseng (曾俊仁)" <Chun-Jen.Tseng@mediatek.com>]

Hi viresh,

Thanks your review and reply.

The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info instance is per-policy and the reg_lock is
also in this structure. when I have two "policy-0" and "policy-6" use
the same mtk_cpufreq_set_target() function but the info->reg_lock 
is from 2 instance(policy-0 and policy-6). when the policy-0 and
policy-6 call set_target target, the mutex_lock is locked by per-
policy. So, I change to global lock avoid per-policy lock.

BRs,

Mark Tseng

On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 11:12 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On 14-02-25, 15:43, Mark Tseng wrote:
> > In mtk_cpufreq_set_target() is re-enter function but the mutex lock
> > decalre in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info structure for each policy. It should
> > change to global variable for critical session avoid race condition
> > with 2 or more policy.
> 
> And what exactly is the race condition here ? Can you please explain
> that ?
> Since the struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info instance is per-policy, I don't
> think there
> is any race here.
> 
> The lock was introduced earlier to avoid a potential race with
> notifiers, but it
> has nothing to do with calling target simultaneously.
> 
> commit c210063b40ac ("cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification
> support")
> 
> --
> viresh