All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linga, Pavan Kumar" <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <madhu.chittim@intel.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4] idpf: add support for IDPF PCI programming interface
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:05:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2aec7267-32de-4984-a628-e9f8286cdfa3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903125116.GC361157@horms.kernel.org>



On 9/3/2025 5:51 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 08:58:52PM -0700, Pavan Kumar Linga wrote:
>> At present IDPF supports only 0x1452 and 0x145C as PF and VF device IDs
>> on our current generation hardware. Future hardware exposes a new set of
>> device IDs for each generation. To avoid adding a new device ID for each
>> generation and to make the driver forward and backward compatible,
>> make use of the IDPF PCI programming interface to load the driver.
>>
>> Write and read the VF_ARQBAL mailbox register to find if the current
>> device is a PF or a VF.
>>
>> PCI SIG allocated a new programming interface for the IDPF compliant
>> ethernet network controller devices. It can be found at:
>> https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/20113
>> with the document titled as 'PCI Code and ID Assignment Revision 1.16'
>> or any latest revisions.
>>
>> Tested this patch by doing a simple driver load/unload on Intel IPU E2000
>> hardware which supports 0x1452 and 0x145C device IDs and new hardware
>> which supports the IDPF PCI programming interface.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
> 
> Hi Pavan,
> 
> Should this be targeted at iwl, where it applies cleanly,
> rather than net-next, where it does not.
> 
> If the later, I think that a rebase and repost is appropriate.
> 
> ...

My bad. It is targeted for iwl-next, but I marked it as net-next.

Please let me know if you want me to correct the target and send a new 
revision.

Thanks,
Pavan


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Linga, Pavan Kumar" <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <madhu.chittim@intel.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] idpf: add support for IDPF PCI programming interface
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:05:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2aec7267-32de-4984-a628-e9f8286cdfa3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903125116.GC361157@horms.kernel.org>



On 9/3/2025 5:51 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 08:58:52PM -0700, Pavan Kumar Linga wrote:
>> At present IDPF supports only 0x1452 and 0x145C as PF and VF device IDs
>> on our current generation hardware. Future hardware exposes a new set of
>> device IDs for each generation. To avoid adding a new device ID for each
>> generation and to make the driver forward and backward compatible,
>> make use of the IDPF PCI programming interface to load the driver.
>>
>> Write and read the VF_ARQBAL mailbox register to find if the current
>> device is a PF or a VF.
>>
>> PCI SIG allocated a new programming interface for the IDPF compliant
>> ethernet network controller devices. It can be found at:
>> https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/20113
>> with the document titled as 'PCI Code and ID Assignment Revision 1.16'
>> or any latest revisions.
>>
>> Tested this patch by doing a simple driver load/unload on Intel IPU E2000
>> hardware which supports 0x1452 and 0x145C device IDs and new hardware
>> which supports the IDPF PCI programming interface.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
> 
> Hi Pavan,
> 
> Should this be targeted at iwl, where it applies cleanly,
> rather than net-next, where it does not.
> 
> If the later, I think that a rebase and repost is appropriate.
> 
> ...

My bad. It is targeted for iwl-next, but I marked it as net-next.

Please let me know if you want me to correct the target and send a new 
revision.

Thanks,
Pavan


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-03  3:58 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4] idpf: add support for IDPF PCI programming interface Pavan Kumar Linga
2025-09-03  3:58 ` Pavan Kumar Linga
2025-09-03 12:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2025-09-03 12:51   ` Simon Horman
2025-09-04 18:05   ` Linga, Pavan Kumar [this message]
2025-09-04 18:05     ` Linga, Pavan Kumar
2025-09-24 12:58     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Landowski, Marek
2025-09-24 12:58       ` Landowski, Marek
2025-09-24 14:52 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-09-26  0:47   ` Chittim, Madhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2aec7267-32de-4984-a628-e9f8286cdfa3@intel.com \
    --to=pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=madhu.chittim@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.