From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sctp: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in sctp_init()
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 19:46:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c849843-549f-419e-2326-1fcb7bcdc2e2@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170522165658.GA4642@localhost.localdomain>
>> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
>> @@ -1447,5 +1447,4 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
>> if (!sctp_ep_hashtable) {
>> - pr_err("Failed endpoint_hash alloc\n");
>
> Okay but then why not also delete the one a few lines below this one:
> if (!sctp_port_hashtable) {
> pr_err("Failed bind hash alloc\n");
> status = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_bhash_alloc;
> }
> Seems the same pattern to me.
>
>> status = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err_ehash_alloc;
>> }
How do you think about to remove the other error message in another
update step if a consensus would be achieved in such a direction
for this software module?
Regards,
Markus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sctp: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in sctp_init()
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 21:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c849843-549f-419e-2326-1fcb7bcdc2e2@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170522165658.GA4642@localhost.localdomain>
>> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
>> @@ -1447,5 +1447,4 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
>> if (!sctp_ep_hashtable) {
>> - pr_err("Failed endpoint_hash alloc\n");
>
> Okay but then why not also delete the one a few lines below this one:
> if (!sctp_port_hashtable) {
> pr_err("Failed bind hash alloc\n");
> status = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_bhash_alloc;
> }
> Seems the same pattern to me.
>
>> status = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err_ehash_alloc;
>> }
How do you think about to remove the other error message in another
update step if a consensus would be achieved in such a direction
for this software module?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-22 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-22 16:35 [PATCH 0/5] net-SCTP: Adjustments for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:35 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] sctp: Use kmalloc_array() in sctp_init() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:37 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 19:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 20:57 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 20:57 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] sctp: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation " SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:38 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:56 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 16:56 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:46 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2017-05-22 19:46 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 19:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 20:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 20:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] sctp: Fix a typo in a comment line " SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:39 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 19:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 21:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 21:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 16:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] sctp: Improve a size determination in sctp_inetaddr_event() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 19:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 21:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 21:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] sctp: Adjust one function call together with a variable assignment SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 16:41 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-22 19:53 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 19:53 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-05-22 21:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-22 21:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-05-23 6:34 ` [PATCH 0/5] net-SCTP: Adjustments for three function implementations Xin Long
2017-05-23 6:34 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c849843-549f-419e-2326-1fcb7bcdc2e2@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.