All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: "Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] memblock: keep reserve_mem regions out of KHO bootmem
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 15:37:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzqzhhg8l3.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021211058.83483-1-azpijr@gmail.com> (Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2026 23:10:44 +0200")

On Wed, Oct 21 2026, Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga wrote:

> On a KHO boot, a reserve_mem= region that can't be revived (new name,
> size or alignment) can be allocated from KHO bootmem, which the next
> kernel boots out of. With CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUG preserving it
> fails; without it, the next kernel's memmap ends up on top of it.

What's your use-case? Why are you adding new reserve_mem regions after
cold boot? I'd rather avoid making purely theoretical fixes.

[...]

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: "Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,  Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
	 Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
	 Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	 "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	 Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] memblock: keep reserve_mem regions out of KHO bootmem
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 15:37:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzqzhhg8l3.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021211058.83483-1-azpijr@gmail.com> (Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2026 23:10:44 +0200")

On Wed, Oct 21 2026, Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga wrote:

> On a KHO boot, a reserve_mem= region that can't be revived (new name,
> size or alignment) can be allocated from KHO bootmem, which the next
> kernel boots out of. With CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_DEBUG preserving it
> fails; without it, the next kernel's memmap ends up on top of it.

What's your use-case? Why are you adding new reserve_mem regions after
cold boot? I'd rather avoid making purely theoretical fixes.

[...]

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21 21:10 [RFC PATCH 0/2] memblock: keep reserve_mem regions out of KHO bootmem Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-10-21 21:10 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-10-21 21:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] memblock: factor out the KHO bootmem check from memblock_alloc_hugetlb() Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-10-21 21:10   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-10-21 21:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 21:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] memblock: don't allocate reserve_mem regions from KHO bootmem Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-10-21 21:10   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-10-21 21:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-22 13:37 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-10-22 13:37   ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] memblock: keep reserve_mem regions out of " Pratyush Yadav
2026-10-22 20:16   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-10-22 20:16     ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2vxzqzhhg8l3.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
    --cc=changyuanl@google.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.