From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: vexpress: DT-based support for Cortex-A5 and Cortex-A9 based tiles
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3031582.pcIGOLc7WK@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323284788.32116.11.camel@hornet.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 19:06:28 Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 23:13 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Actually, I have to take that back. Looking at both patch 5 and 6,
> > the dt-ca*.c files are almost identical and all the differences are about stuff
> > that you can find in the device tree:
>
> You are obviously right - I was rushing with that. Less is better then
> more Will respin tomorrow.
Ok, great!
> > * The iotable gets initialized from "mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0", which would
> > be fine if that worked on all machines, but in order to unify the two
> > files, I would recommend searching the flat device tree for the respective
> > node and only map it if present.
> >
> > * You have two ways of finding out the number of cores, but looking in
> > the device tree would just work either way.
>
> Those two are actually related, as it's all about memory mapped SCU in
> case of A5/A9 and CP15-controlled on A7/15 (the *smp_enable() is
> different as well).
>
> I'll probably just define a "scu" node compatible with
> "arm,cortex-a9-scu" and use the A5/A9 SMP callbacks if it's present (and
> create static mapping for it) or the A7/15 if it's missing.
Fair enough.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: vexpress: DT-based support for Cortex-A5 and Cortex-A9 based tiles
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3031582.pcIGOLc7WK@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323284788.32116.11.camel-okZbbLrgpR/YkXV2EHHjLW3o5bpOHsLO@public.gmane.org>
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 19:06:28 Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 23:13 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Actually, I have to take that back. Looking at both patch 5 and 6,
> > the dt-ca*.c files are almost identical and all the differences are about stuff
> > that you can find in the device tree:
>
> You are obviously right - I was rushing with that. Less is better then
> more Will respin tomorrow.
Ok, great!
> > * The iotable gets initialized from "mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0", which would
> > be fine if that worked on all machines, but in order to unify the two
> > files, I would recommend searching the flat device tree for the respective
> > node and only map it if present.
> >
> > * You have two ways of finding out the number of cores, but looking in
> > the device tree would just work either way.
>
> Those two are actually related, as it's all about memory mapped SCU in
> case of A5/A9 and CP15-controlled on A7/15 (the *smp_enable() is
> different as well).
>
> I'll probably just define a "scu" node compatible with
> "arm,cortex-a9-scu" and use the A5/A9 SMP callbacks if it's present (and
> create static mapping for it) or the A7/15 if it's missing.
Fair enough.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-07 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-06 15:43 [PATCH v4 0/6] Versatile Express DT support Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] ARM: versatile: Add missing ENDPROC to headsmp.S Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 22:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] ARM: vexpress: Get rid of MMIO_P2V Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] ARM: vexpress: Add DT support for the motherboard Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 22:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-07 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-07 22:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-08 10:37 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-08 10:37 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-08 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-08 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ARM: vexpress: Motherboard RS1 memory map support Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: vexpress: DT-based support for Cortex-A5 and Cortex-A9 based tiles Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 22:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 22:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 23:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-06 23:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-07 19:06 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-07 19:06 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-07 22:50 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-12-07 22:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-07 15:08 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-07 15:08 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-07 19:12 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-07 19:12 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-07 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-07 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-07 19:09 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-07 19:09 ` Pawel Moll
2011-12-08 11:40 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-08 11:40 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] ARM: vexpress: DT-based support for Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15 " Pawel Moll
2011-12-06 15:43 ` Pawel Moll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3031582.pcIGOLc7WK@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.