All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ARP Proxy
@ 2005-01-31 14:01 Moritz Gartenmeister
  2005-01-31 14:05 ` George Alexandru Dragoi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Moritz Gartenmeister @ 2005-01-31 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

hi

i'm not sure, if am right here, so if i am wrong, pleas point me to a source ;-)

how can i reduce arp-broadcasts without routing?

i have physically 2 subnets (500 and 300 clients), logically this is one subnet. my premature/naive 
idea is, to install a linux-bridge and put arp-proxy on it. as long as the proxy has the correct 
entry, broadcasts are not propagated. this will reduce arp-broadcasts.

i know, i have to bend alot of principles, but will it work?

cheers
moritz


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: ARP Proxy
  2005-01-31 14:01 ARP Proxy Moritz Gartenmeister
@ 2005-01-31 14:05 ` George Alexandru Dragoi
  2005-01-31 21:06   ` Andy Van Hoof
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: George Alexandru Dragoi @ 2005-01-31 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Moritz Gartenmeister; +Cc: netfilter

why bridge when it can be .. router? or you can use a central switch
that can do vlans (with so many client there should be enough funds
for a 2950 catalyst :) .


On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:01:21 +0100, Moritz Gartenmeister
<moritz@uplink-verein.ch> wrote:
> hi
> 
> i'm not sure, if am right here, so if i am wrong, pleas point me to a source ;-)
> 
> how can i reduce arp-broadcasts without routing?
> 
> i have physically 2 subnets (500 and 300 clients), logically this is one subnet. my premature/naive
> idea is, to install a linux-bridge and put arp-proxy on it. as long as the proxy has the correct
> entry, broadcasts are not propagated. this will reduce arp-broadcasts.
> 
> i know, i have to bend alot of principles, but will it work?
> 
> cheers
> moritz
> 
> 


-- 
Bla bla


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: ARP Proxy
  2005-01-31 14:05 ` George Alexandru Dragoi
@ 2005-01-31 21:06   ` Andy Van Hoof
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Van Hoof @ 2005-01-31 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

You shouldn't do this.

A better way would bet to split the subnet into 2 subnets and use a router.

Why would you want to keep all those clients in 1 subnet? If it's because of
netbios, use wins/dns? That's gonna lower your broadcasting quite a bit on
its own.

Andy
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] Namens George Alexandru
Dragoi
Verzonden: maandag 31 januari 2005 15:05
Aan: Moritz Gartenmeister
CC: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Onderwerp: Re: ARP Proxy

why bridge when it can be .. router? or you can use a central switch
that can do vlans (with so many client there should be enough funds
for a 2950 catalyst :) .


On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:01:21 +0100, Moritz Gartenmeister
<moritz@uplink-verein.ch> wrote:
> hi
> 
> i'm not sure, if am right here, so if i am wrong, pleas point me to a
source ;-)
> 
> how can i reduce arp-broadcasts without routing?
> 
> i have physically 2 subnets (500 and 300 clients), logically this is one
subnet. my premature/naive
> idea is, to install a linux-bridge and put arp-proxy on it. as long as the
proxy has the correct
> entry, broadcasts are not propagated. this will reduce arp-broadcasts.
> 
> i know, i have to bend alot of principles, but will it work?
> 
> cheers
> moritz
> 
> 


-- 
Bla bla






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-31 21:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-31 14:01 ARP Proxy Moritz Gartenmeister
2005-01-31 14:05 ` George Alexandru Dragoi
2005-01-31 21:06   ` Andy Van Hoof

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.