All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stefan Brüns" <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] iio: adc: ina2xx: add in early -EINVAL returns in case statements
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:26:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3078823.PklSZE2rHu@pebbles> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016161418.29213-1-colin.king@canonical.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1834 bytes --]

On Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2018 18:14:18 CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Static analysis with CoverityScan is throwing warnings that specific
> case statements are missing breaks.  Rather than adding breaks, add
> return -EINVAL to the specific case statements to clarify the
> error return paths. Fix also saves 50 bytes.
> 
> Before:
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>   21418	   4936	    128	  26482	   6772	drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
> 
> After:
>   dec	    hex	filename
>   21370	   4936	    128	  26434	   6742	drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
> 
> (gcc 8.2, x86-64)
> 
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462408 ("Missing break in switch")
> 
> ---
> 
> V2: use returns instead of break statements to keep with the
> current style used in the switch statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> index d1239624187d..bdd7cba6f6b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			*val2 = chip->shunt_resistor_uohm;
>  			return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
>  		}
> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
>  		switch (chan->address) {
> @@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			*val = chip->range_vbus == 32 ? 1 : 2;
>  			return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  		}
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 
>  	return -EINVAL;


-- 
Stefan Brüns  /  Bergstraße 21  /  52062 Aachen
home: +49 241 53809034     mobile: +49 151 50412019

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Stefan Brüns" <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] iio: adc: ina2xx: add in early -EINVAL returns in case statements
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 20:26:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3078823.PklSZE2rHu@pebbles> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016161418.29213-1-colin.king@canonical.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1834 bytes --]

On Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2018 18:14:18 CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Static analysis with CoverityScan is throwing warnings that specific
> case statements are missing breaks.  Rather than adding breaks, add
> return -EINVAL to the specific case statements to clarify the
> error return paths. Fix also saves 50 bytes.
> 
> Before:
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>   21418	   4936	    128	  26482	   6772	drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
> 
> After:
>   dec	    hex	filename
>   21370	   4936	    128	  26434	   6742	drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
> 
> (gcc 8.2, x86-64)
> 
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462408 ("Missing break in switch")
> 
> ---
> 
> V2: use returns instead of break statements to keep with the
> current style used in the switch statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> index d1239624187d..bdd7cba6f6b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			*val2 = chip->shunt_resistor_uohm;
>  			return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
>  		}
> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
>  		switch (chan->address) {
> @@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			*val = chip->range_vbus == 32 ? 1 : 2;
>  			return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  		}
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 
>  	return -EINVAL;


-- 
Stefan Brüns  /  Bergstraße 21  /  52062 Aachen
home: +49 241 53809034     mobile: +49 151 50412019

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-16 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-16 16:14 [PATCH][V2] iio: adc: ina2xx: add in early -EINVAL returns in case statements Colin King
2018-10-16 16:14 ` Colin King
2018-10-16 18:26 ` Stefan Brüns [this message]
2018-10-16 18:26   ` Stefan Brüns
2018-10-21 14:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-10-21 14:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-10-21 14:45     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3078823.PklSZE2rHu@pebbles \
    --to=stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.