From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: use parity8 helper instead of open coding it
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3117d2d9-260a-4e02-8c22-4e078e01ddd5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107090204.6593-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
On 1/7/25 11:02 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> The kernel has now a generic helper for getting parity with easier to
> understand semantics. Make use of it. Here, it also fixes a bug because
> the correct algorithm is using XOR ('^=') instead of ADD ('+=').
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Change since v3:
>
> * updated commit message to mention the bugfix
>
> I intentionally did not add a Fixes tag because this fix depends on
> patch 1. The proper fix for backporting would change this to XOR, I'd
> think.
>
Stable rules allow also cherry picking additional patches. To me picking
patch 1 and 4 sounds better than an intermediate fix since bug has been
here from the beginning. IMHO not so urgent than a regression.
Looks like we have been lucky. First dynamic address is 0x9 and previous
algorithm gets the same calculated dat_w0 value for at least for the
addresses 0x9 and 0xa.
--
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: use parity8 helper instead of open coding it
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3117d2d9-260a-4e02-8c22-4e078e01ddd5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107090204.6593-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
On 1/7/25 11:02 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> The kernel has now a generic helper for getting parity with easier to
> understand semantics. Make use of it. Here, it also fixes a bug because
> the correct algorithm is using XOR ('^=') instead of ADD ('+=').
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Change since v3:
>
> * updated commit message to mention the bugfix
>
> I intentionally did not add a Fixes tag because this fix depends on
> patch 1. The proper fix for backporting would change this to XOR, I'd
> think.
>
Stable rules allow also cherry picking additional patches. To me picking
patch 1 and 4 sounds better than an intermediate fix since bug has been
here from the beginning. IMHO not so urgent than a regression.
Looks like we have been lucky. First dynamic address is 0x9 and previous
algorithm gets the same calculated dat_w0 value for at least for the
addresses 0x9 and 0xa.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 9:01 [PATCH v4 0/5] i3c: introduce and use generic parity helper Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8 Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] hwmon: (spd5118) Use generic parity calculation Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] i3c: dw: use parity8 helper instead of open coding it Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: " Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-08 12:09 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2025-01-08 12:09 ` Jarkko Nikula
2025-01-08 12:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-08 12:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-08 15:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
2025-01-08 15:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
2025-01-07 9:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] i3c: cdns: " Wolfram Sang
2025-01-07 9:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-08 7:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] i3c: introduce and use generic parity helper Wolfram Sang
2025-01-08 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-01-12 23:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-01-12 23:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3117d2d9-260a-4e02-8c22-4e078e01ddd5@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.