Core-image-x11 don't boot

Core-image-x11 don't boot

[Riccardo Stronati]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1248 bytes --]

I'm testing Yocto 1.6 on edm1-fairy board which is an imx6 based board (
http://www.technexion.com/index.php/products/edm/edm-carrier-boards/edm1-fairy
).

I need at least the core-image-x11 image to get Qt5 support.

When I boot the board I get this error:

[    5.019809] mmcblk1: mmc2:0007 SD08G 7.41 GiB
[    5.030470]  mmcblk1: p1 p2
[    5.051932] EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p2): mounting ext3 file system using the
ext4 subsystem
[    5.267823] EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p2): mounted filesystem with ordered data
mode. Opts: (null)
[    5.276074] VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on device 179:26.
[    5.298443] devtmpfs: mounted
[    5.301625] Freeing init memory: 180K
sh: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device
sh: no job control in this shell
sh-4.3#

This is the uname output:
Linux failyboard 3.0.35-4.1.0-edm_fairy+ga97aa82 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 28
21:53:12 CEST 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux

I have to tell that during the do_rootfs task I get an error about
initscripts:
Computing transaction error... Can't install dbus etc etc
I wrote on the irc channel that told me to run "bitbake initscripts", after
that the roofs task get done but the board doesn't boot.

Thanks to all,

Riccardo.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1564 bytes --]

Re: Core-image-x11 don't boot

[Otavio Salvador]

Hello Riccardo,

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Riccardo Stronati <r.stronati@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm testing Yocto 1.6 on edm1-fairy board which is an imx6 based board
> (http://www.technexion.com/index.php/products/edm/edm-carrier-boards/edm1-fairy).
>
> I need at least the core-image-x11 image to get Qt5 support.
>
> When I boot the board I get this error:
>
> [    5.019809] mmcblk1: mmc2:0007 SD08G 7.41 GiB
> [    5.030470]  mmcblk1: p1 p2
> [    5.051932] EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p2): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4
> subsystem
> [    5.267823] EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p2): mounted filesystem with ordered data
> mode. Opts: (null)
> [    5.276074] VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on device 179:26.
> [    5.298443] devtmpfs: mounted
> [    5.301625] Freeing init memory: 180K
> sh: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device
> sh: no job control in this shell
> sh-4.3#
>
> This is the uname output:
> Linux failyboard 3.0.35-4.1.0-edm_fairy+ga97aa82 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 28
> 21:53:12 CEST 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux
>
> I have to tell that during the do_rootfs task I get an error about
> initscripts:
> Computing transaction error... Can't install dbus etc etc
> I wrote on the irc channel that told me to run "bitbake initscripts", after
> that the roofs task get done but the board doesn't boot.

This seems like a defconfig error. Please contact TechNexion people
regarding this as this is not supported by our layers.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: Core-image-x11 don't boot

[Riccardo Stronati]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2132 bytes --]

Hi Otavio,

maybe is a defconfig problem, I see a defconfig patch in the kernel
bbclass. What I'm missing is why the core-image-minimal boot without any
problem.

Is there a way to substitute the defconfig with something used by Yocto?

Thanks, Riccardo.


2014-04-29 0:20 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>:

> Hello Riccardo,
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Riccardo Stronati <r.stronati@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm testing Yocto 1.6 on edm1-fairy board which is an imx6 based board
> > (
> http://www.technexion.com/index.php/products/edm/edm-carrier-boards/edm1-fairy
> ).
> >
> > I need at least the core-image-x11 image to get Qt5 support.
> >
> > When I boot the board I get this error:
> >
> > [    5.019809] mmcblk1: mmc2:0007 SD08G 7.41 GiB
> > [    5.030470]  mmcblk1: p1 p2
> > [    5.051932] EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p2): mounting ext3 file system using the
> ext4
> > subsystem
> > [    5.267823] EXT4-fs (mmcblk1p2): mounted filesystem with ordered data
> > mode. Opts: (null)
> > [    5.276074] VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on device 179:26.
> > [    5.298443] devtmpfs: mounted
> > [    5.301625] Freeing init memory: 180K
> > sh: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for
> device
> > sh: no job control in this shell
> > sh-4.3#
> >
> > This is the uname output:
> > Linux failyboard 3.0.35-4.1.0-edm_fairy+ga97aa82 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr
> 28
> > 21:53:12 CEST 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux
> >
> > I have to tell that during the do_rootfs task I get an error about
> > initscripts:
> > Computing transaction error... Can't install dbus etc etc
> > I wrote on the irc channel that told me to run "bitbake initscripts",
> after
> > that the roofs task get done but the board doesn't boot.
>
> This seems like a defconfig error. Please contact TechNexion people
> regarding this as this is not supported by our layers.
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3204 bytes --]

Utilite?

[randy.krakora]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 264 bytes --]

Has anyone built 3.10.17 images with gstreamer 1.0 for Utilite?

Regards,
Randy Krakora
Freescale i.MX Automotive FAE
Freescale Semiconductor
2733 South Albright Road
469023996 KOKOMO, IN
United States
Phone: (765)860-6622
randy.krakora@freescale.com


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3249 bytes --]

Re: Core-image-x11 don't boot

[Otavio Salvador]

Hello Riccardo,

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Riccardo Stronati <r.stronati@gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe is a defconfig problem, I see a defconfig patch in the kernel bbclass.
> What I'm missing is why the core-image-minimal boot without any problem.
>
> Is there a way to substitute the defconfig with something used by Yocto?

You can replace it in the layer. You should compare the contents and
check the possible changes you need.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: Utilite?

[Otavio Salvador]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:44 AM, randy.krakora@freescale.com
<randy.krakora@freescale.com> wrote:
> Has anyone built 3.10.17 images with gstreamer 1.0 for Utilite?

Utility has not been send for inclusion in FSL Community BSP so I
think most people are not using/aware of it.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: Utilite?

[Chris Tapp]

On 29 Apr 2014, at 18:21, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:44 AM, randy.krakora@freescale.com
> <randy.krakora@freescale.com> wrote:
>> Has anyone built 3.10.17 images with gstreamer 1.0 for Utilite?
> 
> Utility has not been send for inclusion in FSL Community BSP so I
> think most people are not using/aware of it.

It's a platform that I've been meaning to find time to evaluate. Spec is similar to the Wandboards, but in a product-ready format.

I'm guessing it shouldn't be too difficult to get it running?

Chris Tapp

opensource@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

Re: Utilite?

[Otavio Salvador]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Chris Tapp <opensource@keylevel.com> wrote:
>
> On 29 Apr 2014, at 18:21, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:44 AM, randy.krakora@freescale.com
>> <randy.krakora@freescale.com> wrote:
>>> Has anyone built 3.10.17 images with gstreamer 1.0 for Utilite?
>>
>> Utility has not been send for inclusion in FSL Community BSP so I
>> think most people are not using/aware of it.
>
> It's a platform that I've been meaning to find time to evaluate. Spec is similar to the Wandboards, but in a product-ready format.
>
> I'm guessing it shouldn't be too difficult to get it running?

It shouldn't. It is a matter of CompuLab sponsor its addition or add
it themselves.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: Utilite?

[David Chirgwin]

Hi Otavio,

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Otavio Salvador" <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> To: "Chris Tapp" <opensource@keylevel.com>
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 April, 2014 10:41:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Utilite?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Chris Tapp <opensource@keylevel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 29 Apr 2014, at 18:21, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:44 AM, randy.krakora@freescale.com
> >> <randy.krakora@freescale.com> wrote:
> >>> Has anyone built 3.10.17 images with gstreamer 1.0 for Utilite?
> >>
> >> Utility has not been send for inclusion in FSL Community BSP so I
> >> think most people are not using/aware of it.
> >
> > It's a platform that I've been meaning to find time to evaluate.
> > Spec is similar to the Wandboards, but in a product-ready format.
> >
> > I'm guessing it shouldn't be too difficult to get it running?
> 
> It shouldn't. It is a matter of CompuLab sponsor its addition or add
> it themselves.
> 
I'm interested in this comment because we also have a i.MX6 board that
uses Yocto but is not currently included. 
What is the process for adding a new board to the FSL Community BSP? 
Are there any costs involved? 
What level of commitment is expected of a board supplier in the future?
I'm not sure we have the resources to be making continual updates like some of you seem to do. 
Any guidelines or comments would be great.

Regards,

Dave C

> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
> 
Blue Chip Technology Limited. Chowley Oak Lane, Tattenhall, Chester, Cheshire CH3 9EX Tel: 01829 772000 Registered in England 3110403 Vat No: GB 618 374134

Re: Utilite?

[Otavio Salvador]

Hello,

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:14 AM, David Chirgwin
<dchirgwin@bluechiptechnology.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Otavio Salvador" <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
>> To: "Chris Tapp" <opensource@keylevel.com>
>> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, 29 April, 2014 10:41:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Utilite?
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Chris Tapp <opensource@keylevel.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 29 Apr 2014, at 18:21, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:44 AM, randy.krakora@freescale.com
>> >> <randy.krakora@freescale.com> wrote:
>> >>> Has anyone built 3.10.17 images with gstreamer 1.0 for Utilite?
>> >>
>> >> Utility has not been send for inclusion in FSL Community BSP so I
>> >> think most people are not using/aware of it.
>> >
>> > It's a platform that I've been meaning to find time to evaluate.
>> > Spec is similar to the Wandboards, but in a product-ready format.
>> >
>> > I'm guessing it shouldn't be too difficult to get it running?
>>
>> It shouldn't. It is a matter of CompuLab sponsor its addition or add
>> it themselves.
>>
> I'm interested in this comment because we also have a i.MX6 board that
> uses Yocto but is not currently included.
> What is the process for adding a new board to the FSL Community BSP?

Someone needs to do the work and commit to maintain it. You essentially need:

 - add the board in meta-fsl-arm-extra
 - update Release Notes
 - has someone as maintainer

all this can be done by the vendor or 3rd party.

> Are there any costs involved?

The FSL Community BSP project is a community project so no costs
involved. You can add the board yourself and send it for review.

> What level of commitment is expected of a board supplier in the future?
> I'm not sure we have the resources to be making continual updates like some of you seem to do.
> Any guidelines or comments would be great.

The commitment is for maintenance and testing. That's why we demand a
maintainer for every board now. So you (or whoever is the maintainer)
is expected to pay attention to the mailing list, support your users
and keep regular testing of stable and development branches and
someone to fix board specific stuff.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750