From: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, avi@scylladb.com, linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] Add io_uring IO interface
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:23:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3189352fb5866022d782811a65022a50@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x4936pr80uw.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On 2019-01-17 21:50, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
>
>> On 1/17/19 1:09 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 1/17/19 1:03 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>>> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/17/19 5:48 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-01-16 18:49, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static int io_allocate_scq_urings(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>>>>>> + struct io_uring_params *p)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct io_sq_ring *sq_ring;
>>>>>>> + struct io_cq_ring *cq_ring;
>>>>>>> + size_t size;
>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + sq_ring = io_mem_alloc(struct_size(sq_ring, array,
>>>>>>> p->sq_entries));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems that sq_entries, cq_entries are not limited at all. Can
>>>>>> nasty
>>>>>> app consume a lot of kernel pages calling io_setup_uring() from a
>>>>>> loop
>>>>>> passing random entries number? (or even better: decreasing entries
>>>>>> number,
>>>>>> in order to consume all pages orders with min number of loops).
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that's an oversight, we should have a limit in place. I'll add
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> Can we charge the ring memory to the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as well? I'd
>>>> prefer
>>>> not to repeat the mistake of fs.aio-max-nr.
>>>
>>> Sure, we can do that. With the ring limited in size (it's now 4k
>>> entries
>>> at most), the amount of memory gobbled up by that is much smaller
>>> than
>>> the fixed buffers. A max sized ring is about 256k of memory.
>
> Per io_uring. Nothing prevents a user from calling io_uring_setup in a
> loop and continuing to gobble up memory.
What if we set a sane limit for a uring instance (not for the whole
io_uring),
but allocate rings on mmap? Then greedy / nasty app will be killed by
oom.
--
Roman
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, avi@scylladb.com, linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] Add io_uring IO interface
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:23:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3189352fb5866022d782811a65022a50@suse.de> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190118082353.2vsaM9bAR5_g5hpiWdafyc5TnCch_fJdlCEOaHz_pq8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x4936pr80uw.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On 2019-01-17 21:50, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
>
>> On 1/17/19 1:09 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 1/17/19 1:03 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>>> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/17/19 5:48 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019-01-16 18:49, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static int io_allocate_scq_urings(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>>>>>> + struct io_uring_params *p)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct io_sq_ring *sq_ring;
>>>>>>> + struct io_cq_ring *cq_ring;
>>>>>>> + size_t size;
>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + sq_ring = io_mem_alloc(struct_size(sq_ring, array,
>>>>>>> p->sq_entries));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems that sq_entries, cq_entries are not limited at all. Can
>>>>>> nasty
>>>>>> app consume a lot of kernel pages calling io_setup_uring() from a
>>>>>> loop
>>>>>> passing random entries number? (or even better: decreasing entries
>>>>>> number,
>>>>>> in order to consume all pages orders with min number of loops).
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that's an oversight, we should have a limit in place. I'll add
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> Can we charge the ring memory to the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as well? I'd
>>>> prefer
>>>> not to repeat the mistake of fs.aio-max-nr.
>>>
>>> Sure, we can do that. With the ring limited in size (it's now 4k
>>> entries
>>> at most), the amount of memory gobbled up by that is much smaller
>>> than
>>> the fixed buffers. A max sized ring is about 256k of memory.
>
> Per io_uring. Nothing prevents a user from calling io_uring_setup in a
> loop and continuing to gobble up memory.
What if we set a sane limit for a uring instance (not for the whole
io_uring),
but allocate rings on mmap? Then greedy / nasty app will be killed by
oom.
--
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-16 17:49 [PATCHSET v5] io_uring IO interface Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 01/15] fs: add an iopoll method to struct file_operations Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 02/15] block: wire up block device iopoll method Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: add bio_set_polled() helper Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 04/15] iomap: wire up the iopoll method Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 05/15] Add io_uring IO interface Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 12:02 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 12:02 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 13:54 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 13:54 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 14:34 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 14:34 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 14:54 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 14:54 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 15:19 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 15:19 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 12:48 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 12:48 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-17 14:01 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 14:01 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 20:03 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 20:03 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 20:09 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 20:09 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 20:14 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 20:14 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 20:50 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 20:50 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 20:53 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 20:53 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 21:02 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 21:02 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 21:17 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 21:17 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 21:21 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 21:21 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-17 21:27 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-17 21:27 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-18 8:23 ` Roman Penyaev [this message]
2019-01-18 8:23 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 06/15] io_uring: add fsync support Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 07/15] io_uring: support for IO polling Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 08/15] fs: add fget_many() and fput_many() Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 09/15] io_uring: use fget/fput_many() for file references Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 10/15] io_uring: batch io_kiocb allocation Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 11/15] block: implement bio helper to add iter bvec pages to bio Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` [PATCH 12/15] io_uring: add support for pre-mapped user IO buffers Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 20:53 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-16 21:20 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 21:20 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 22:09 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-16 22:21 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 22:21 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 23:09 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-16 23:17 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 23:17 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 22:13 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 22:13 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` [PATCH 13/15] io_uring: add submission polling Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` [PATCH 14/15] io_uring: add file registration Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` [PATCH 15/15] io_uring: add io_uring_event cache hit information Jens Axboe
2019-01-16 17:50 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-10 2:43 [PATCHSET v2] io_uring IO interface Jens Axboe
2019-01-10 2:43 ` [PATCH 05/15] Add " Jens Axboe
2019-01-10 2:43 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-11 18:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-01-11 18:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-01-11 18:34 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-11 18:34 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-13 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-13 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2019-01-15 17:31 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-01-15 17:31 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3189352fb5866022d782811a65022a50@suse.de \
--to=rpenyaev@suse.de \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.