[PATCH v2 0/4] add ufs support for Exynosautov920 SoC

[PATCH v2 0/4] add ufs support for Exynosautov920 SoC

[Alim Akhtar]

This series adds ufs driver support for ExynosAutov920,
ExynosAutov920 has the UFSHCI 3.1 compliant UFS controller.

ExynosAutov920 has a different mask of UFS sharability from ExynosAutov9,
so this series provide flexible parameter for the mask.

With this series applied, UFS is functional and basic I/O operations are 
known to be working.

Changes since v1:
* collected Acked-by on patch 2/4
	* This Acked-by from Krzysztof was long back, for now kept it 
* rebased on linux-next
* fixed few self review comments
* split dtsi patch into two, separated out syscon node patch

Link v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20250702013316.2837427-1-sowon.na@samsung.com/

Alim Akhtar (1):
  arm64: dts: exynosautov920: Add syscon hsi2 node

Sowon Na (3):
  dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920 compatible string
  scsi: ufs: exynos: add support for ExynosAutov920 SoC
  arm64: dts: exynosautov920: enable support for ufs controller

 .../bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml      |   1 +
 .../boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts   |   8 ++
 .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi |  27 +++++
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c                 | 110 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 146 insertions(+)


base-commit: 452c3b1ea875276105ac90ba474f72b4cd9b77a2
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: dts: exynosautov920: Add syscon hsi2 node

[Alim Akhtar]

Syscon HSI2 block has system configuration settings for
HSI IPs, like ufs, usb etc. Add a syscon_hsi2 node entry
so that related HSI controller can make use of the same.

Signed-off-by: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
index 0bf7c4cb9846..0eb853770732 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
@@ -1426,6 +1426,12 @@ cmu_hsi2: clock-controller@16b00000 {
 				      "ethernet";
 		};
 
+		syscon_hsi2: syscon@16c00000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-hsi2-sysreg",
+				     "syscon";
+			reg = <0x16c00000 0x800>;
+		};
+
 		pinctrl_hsi2: pinctrl@16c10000 {
 			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0x16c10000 0x10000>;
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920 compatible string

[Alim Akhtar]

From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>

Add samsung,exynosautov920-ufs compatible for ExynosAutov920 SoC.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
index a7eb7ad85a94..710ce493f3b6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
       - samsung,exynos7-ufs
       - samsung,exynosautov9-ufs
       - samsung,exynosautov9-ufs-vh
+      - samsung,exynosautov920-ufs
       - tesla,fsd-ufs
 
   reg:
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920 compatible string

[Alim Akhtar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 5:45 PM
> To: avri.altman@wdc.com; bvanassche@acm.org; robh@kernel.org;
> martin.petersen@oracle.com; krzk+dt@kernel.org
> Cc: sowon.na@samsung.com; peter.griffin@linaro.org; linux-
> scsi@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920
> compatible string
> 
> From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
> 
> Add samsung,exynosautov920-ufs compatible for ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> 
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Just noticed that this email is no longer valid, In case there is a re-spin, will correct this.
Sorry for the noise. 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920 compatible string

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/04/2026 14:02, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 5:45 PM
>> To: avri.altman@wdc.com; bvanassche@acm.org; robh@kernel.org;
>> martin.petersen@oracle.com; krzk+dt@kernel.org
>> Cc: sowon.na@samsung.com; peter.griffin@linaro.org; linux-
>> scsi@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-
>> soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920
>> compatible string
>>
>> From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
>>
>> Add samsung,exynosautov920-ufs compatible for ExynosAutov920 SoC.
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Just noticed that this email is no longer valid, In case there is a re-spin, will correct this.
> Sorry for the noise. 

The ack can stay wild email, it's fine. It still gives the credit to
previous employer.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920 compatible string

[Alim Akhtar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 6:25 PM
> To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; avri.altman@wdc.com;
> bvanassche@acm.org; robh@kernel.org; martin.petersen@oracle.com;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org
> Cc: sowon.na@samsung.com; peter.griffin@linaro.org; linux-
> scsi@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski'
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920
> compatible string
> 
> On 17/04/2026 14:02, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 5:45 PM
> >> To: avri.altman@wdc.com; bvanassche@acm.org; robh@kernel.org;
> >> martin.petersen@oracle.com; krzk+dt@kernel.org
> >> Cc: sowon.na@samsung.com; peter.griffin@linaro.org; linux-
> >> scsi@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-
> >> soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Krzysztof
> >> Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>; Alim Akhtar
> >> <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920
> >> compatible string
> >>
> >> From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Add samsung,exynosautov920-ufs compatible for ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > Just noticed that this email is no longer valid, In case there is a re-spin, will
> correct this.
> > Sorry for the noise.
> 
> The ack can stay wild email, it's fine. It still gives the credit to previous
> employer.
> 
Thanks Krzysztof for clarification. 

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920 compatible string

[Peter Griffin]

On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 12:58, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
>
> Add samsung,exynosautov920-ufs compatible for ExynosAutov920 SoC.
>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>

>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
> index a7eb7ad85a94..710ce493f3b6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
>        - samsung,exynos7-ufs
>        - samsung,exynosautov9-ufs
>        - samsung,exynosautov9-ufs-vh
> +      - samsung,exynosautov920-ufs
>        - tesla,fsd-ufs
>
>    reg:
> --
> 2.34.1
>

[PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: ufs: exynos: add support for ExynosAutov920 SoC

[Alim Akhtar]

From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>

Add a dedicated compatible and drv_data with associated hooks for
ExynosAutov920 SoC.

ExynosAutov920 has a different mask of UFS sharability
from ExynosAutov9, so add related changes for the same.

Signed-off-by: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
[Alim: fixed unintended changes, other fixes]
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
index 77a6c8e44485..b2f65c465525 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
@@ -97,6 +97,10 @@
 #define UFS_EXYNOSAUTO_RD_SHARABLE	BIT(1)
 #define UFS_EXYNOSAUTO_SHARABLE		(UFS_EXYNOSAUTO_WR_SHARABLE | \
 					 UFS_EXYNOSAUTO_RD_SHARABLE)
+#define UFS_EXYNOSAUTOV920_WR_SHARABLE	BIT(3)
+#define UFS_EXYNOSAUTOV920_RD_SHARABLE	BIT(2)
+#define UFS_EXYNOSAUTOV920_SHARABLE	(UFS_EXYNOSAUTOV920_WR_SHARABLE |\
+					 UFS_EXYNOSAUTOV920_RD_SHARABLE)
 #define UFS_GS101_WR_SHARABLE		BIT(1)
 #define UFS_GS101_RD_SHARABLE		BIT(0)
 #define UFS_GS101_SHARABLE		(UFS_GS101_WR_SHARABLE | \
@@ -417,6 +421,95 @@ static int exynos7_ufs_post_pwr_change(struct exynos_ufs *ufs,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int exynosautov920_ufs_pre_link(struct exynos_ufs *ufs)
+{
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = ufs->hba;
+	int i;
+	u32 tx_line_reset_period, rx_line_reset_period;
+
+	rx_line_reset_period = (RX_LINE_RESET_TIME * ufs->mclk_rate)
+				/ NSEC_PER_MSEC;
+	tx_line_reset_period = (TX_LINE_RESET_TIME * ufs->mclk_rate)
+				/ NSEC_PER_MSEC;
+
+	unipro_writel(ufs, 0x5f, 0x44);
+
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0x200), 0x40);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0x202), 0x02);
+
+	for_each_ufs_rx_lane(ufs, i) {
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_RX_CLK_PRD, i),
+			       DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, ufs->mclk_rate));
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_RX_CLK_PRD_EN, i), 0x0);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_RX_LINERESET_VALUE2, i),
+			       (rx_line_reset_period >> 16) & 0xFF);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_RX_LINERESET_VALUE1, i),
+			       (rx_line_reset_period >> 8) & 0xFF);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_RX_LINERESET_VALUE0, i),
+			       (rx_line_reset_period) & 0xFF);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x2f, i), 0x69);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x84, i), 0x1);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x25, i), 0xf6);
+	}
+
+	for_each_ufs_tx_lane(ufs, i) {
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_TX_CLK_PRD, i),
+			       DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, ufs->mclk_rate));
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_TX_CLK_PRD_EN, i),
+			       0x02);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_TX_LINERESET_PVALUE2, i),
+			       (tx_line_reset_period >> 16) & 0xFF);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_TX_LINERESET_PVALUE1, i),
+			       (tx_line_reset_period >> 8) & 0xFF);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(VND_TX_LINERESET_PVALUE0, i),
+			       (tx_line_reset_period) & 0xFF);
+
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x04, i), 0x1);
+		ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x7f, i), 0x0);
+	}
+
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0x200), 0x0);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_LOCAL_TX_LCC_ENABLE), 0x0);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0xa011), 0x8000);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int exynosautov920_ufs_post_link(struct exynos_ufs *ufs)
+{
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = ufs->hba;
+
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0x9529), 0x1);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0x15a4), 0x3e8);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0x9529), 0x0);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int exynosautov920_ufs_pre_pwr_change(struct exynos_ufs *ufs,
+					     struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *pwr)
+{
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = ufs->hba;
+
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(0x15d4), 0x1);
+
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(DL_FC0PROTTIMEOUTVAL), 8064);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(DL_TC0REPLAYTIMEOUTVAL), 28224);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(DL_AFC0REQTIMEOUTVAL), 20160);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA0), 12000);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA1), 32000);
+	ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA2), 16000);
+
+	unipro_writel(ufs, 8064, UNIPRO_DME_POWERMODE_REQ_LOCALL2TIMER0);
+	unipro_writel(ufs, 28224, UNIPRO_DME_POWERMODE_REQ_LOCALL2TIMER1);
+	unipro_writel(ufs, 20160, UNIPRO_DME_POWERMODE_REQ_LOCALL2TIMER2);
+	unipro_writel(ufs, 12000, UNIPRO_DME_POWERMODE_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER0);
+	unipro_writel(ufs, 32000, UNIPRO_DME_POWERMODE_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER1);
+	unipro_writel(ufs, 16000, UNIPRO_DME_POWERMODE_REQ_REMOTEL2TIMER2);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * exynos_ufs_auto_ctrl_hcc - HCI core clock control by h/w
  * Control should be disabled in the below cases
@@ -2201,6 +2294,21 @@ static const struct exynos_ufs_drv_data gs101_ufs_drvs = {
 	.suspend		= gs101_ufs_suspend,
 };
 
+static const struct exynos_ufs_drv_data exynosautov920_ufs_drvs = {
+	.uic_attr               = &exynos7_uic_attr,
+	.quirks                 = UFSHCD_QUIRK_SKIP_DEF_UNIPRO_TIMEOUT_SETTING,
+	.opts                   = EXYNOS_UFS_OPT_BROKEN_AUTO_CLK_CTRL |
+				  EXYNOS_UFS_OPT_SKIP_CONFIG_PHY_ATTR |
+				  EXYNOS_UFS_OPT_BROKEN_RX_SEL_IDX |
+				  EXYNOS_UFS_OPT_TIMER_TICK_SELECT,
+	.iocc_mask		= UFS_EXYNOSAUTOV920_SHARABLE,
+	.drv_init               = exynosauto_ufs_drv_init,
+	.post_hce_enable        = exynosauto_ufs_post_hce_enable,
+	.pre_link               = exynosautov920_ufs_pre_link,
+	.post_link              = exynosautov920_ufs_post_link,
+	.pre_pwr_change         = exynosautov920_ufs_pre_pwr_change,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id exynos_ufs_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "google,gs101-ufs",
 	  .data	      = &gs101_ufs_drvs },
@@ -2210,6 +2318,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_ufs_of_match[] = {
 	  .data	      = &exynosauto_ufs_drvs },
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov9-ufs-vh",
 	  .data	      = &exynosauto_ufs_vh_drvs },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-ufs",
+	  .data       = &exynosautov920_ufs_drvs },
 	{ .compatible = "tesla,fsd-ufs",
 	  .data       = &fsd_ufs_drvs },
 	{},
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: exynosautov920: enable support for ufs controller

[Alim Akhtar]

From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>

Add ufs node for ExynosAutov920 SoC. Also enable ufs_phy and
ufs controller nodes.

Signed-off-by: Sowon Na <sowon.na@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
---
 .../boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts   |  8 +++++++
 .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts
index a397f068ed53..5873720c213e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts
@@ -83,6 +83,14 @@ &usi_0 {
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
+&ufs_0 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&ufs_0_phy {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
 &xtcxo {
 	clock-frequency = <38400000>;
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
index 0eb853770732..f1f5efcdb91e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
@@ -1444,6 +1444,27 @@ pinctrl_hsi2ufs: pinctrl@16d20000 {
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 603 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		};
 
+		ufs_0: ufs@16e00000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-ufs";
+			reg = <0x16e00000 0x100>,
+			      <0x16e01100 0x400>,
+			      <0x16e80000 0x8000>,
+			      <0x16d08000 0x800>;
+			reg-names = "hci", "vs_hci", "unipro", "ufsp";
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 613 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&cmu_hsi2 CLK_MOUT_HSI2_UFS_EMBD_USER>,
+				 <&cmu_hsi2 CLK_MOUT_HSI2_NOC_UFS_USER>;
+			clock-names = "core_clk", "sclk_unipro_main";
+			freq-table-hz = <0 0>, <0 0>;
+			pinctrl-names = "default";
+			pinctrl-0 = <&ufs_rst_n &ufs_refclk_out>;
+			phys = <&ufs_0_phy>;
+			phy-names = "ufs-phy";
+			samsung,sysreg = <&syscon_hsi2 0x710>;
+			dma-coherent;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
 		ufs_0_phy: phy@16e04000 {
 			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-ufs-phy";
 			reg = <0x16e04000 0x4000>;
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] add ufs support for Exynosautov920 SoC

[Martin K. Petersen]

Alim,

> This series adds ufs driver support for ExynosAutov920,
> ExynosAutov920 has the UFSHCI 3.1 compliant UFS controller.

Applied #2 + #3 to 7.2/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/4] add ufs support for Exynosautov920 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:44:48 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> This series adds ufs driver support for ExynosAutov920,
> ExynosAutov920 has the UFSHCI 3.1 compliant UFS controller.
> 
> ExynosAutov920 has a different mask of UFS sharability from ExynosAutov9,
> so this series provide flexible parameter for the mask.
> 
> With this series applied, UFS is functional and basic I/O operations are
> known to be working.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/4] arm64: dts: exynosautov920: Add syscon hsi2 node
      https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/14b0c168c7038f1d9e50f27e47d8e285f52cd2a3
[4/4] arm64: dts: exynosautov920: enable support for ufs controller
      https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/ae326b14b2a5a5e426bea0210b984ee8dc5ed0bb

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/4] add ufs support for Exynosautov920 SoC

[Martin K. Petersen]

On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:44:48 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:

> This series adds ufs driver support for ExynosAutov920,
> ExynosAutov920 has the UFSHCI 3.1 compliant UFS controller.
> 
> ExynosAutov920 has a different mask of UFS sharability from ExynosAutov9,
> so this series provide flexible parameter for the mask.
> 
> With this series applied, UFS is functional and basic I/O operations are
> known to be working.
> 
> [...]

Applied to 7.2/scsi-queue, thanks!

[2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: exynos: add ExynosAutov920 compatible string
      https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/45c9dee6d653
[3/4] scsi: ufs: exynos: add support for ExynosAutov920 SoC
      https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/50349bd5d0ab

-- 
Martin K. Petersen