[meta-python][dunfell][PATCH] python3-fasteners: Revert new override syntax

[meta-python][dunfell][PATCH] python3-fasteners: Revert new override syntax

[Clemens Terasa]

Commit 7889158dcd187546fc5e99fd81d0779cad3e8d17 introduces a regression,
breaking a dunfell build. It adds a variable override of RDEPENDS with
the new colon based syntax, that was introduced with honister but is
incompatible with dunfell.

Fix this by using the plain old underscore syntax.

Signed-off-by: Clemens Terasa <clemens.terasa@garz-fricke.com>
---
 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb
index 1ba2c6f20..7ebaa4590 100644
--- a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb
+++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "b1ab4e5adfbc28681ce44b3024421c4f567e705cc3963c732bf1cba334
 
 inherit pypi setuptools3
 
-RDEPENDS:${PN} += "\
+RDEPENDS_${PN} += "\
     ${PYTHON_PN}-logging \
     ${PYTHON_PN}-fcntl \
 "
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [oe] [meta-python][dunfell][PATCH] python3-fasteners: Revert new override syntax

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:58 AM Clemens Terasa via
lists.openembedded.org
<clemens.terasa=garz-fricke.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
> Commit 7889158dcd187546fc5e99fd81d0779cad3e8d17 introduces a regression,
> breaking a dunfell build. It adds a variable override of RDEPENDS with
> the new colon based syntax, that was introduced with honister but is
> incompatible with dunfell.
>
> Fix this by using the plain old underscore syntax.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clemens Terasa <clemens.terasa@garz-fricke.com>
> ---
>  meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb
> index 1ba2c6f20..7ebaa4590 100644
> --- a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb
> +++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-fasteners_0.16.3.bb
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "b1ab4e5adfbc28681ce44b3024421c4f567e705cc3963c732bf1cba334
>
>  inherit pypi setuptools3
>
> -RDEPENDS:${PN} += "\
> +RDEPENDS_${PN} += "\

perhaps you can try with latest dunfell release of bitbake and see if
you still see the issue.

>      ${PYTHON_PN}-logging \
>      ${PYTHON_PN}-fcntl \
>  "
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#95908): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/95908
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89666632/1997914
> Group Owner: openembedded-devel+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

Re: [meta-python][dunfell][PATCH] python3-fasteners: Revert new override syntax

[Clemens Terasa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 556 bytes --]

You are total right, my bad.

I checked out the poky dunfell-23.0.11 tag, however, the BBSERVER was still running in the background and thus using the old bitbake.

But shouldn't meta-openembedded be as compatible as possible? I am sure this habe been discussed dozens of times and I am ignorantly not researching enough.
At least in this case I do not see a compelling cause to use the new override style, that might potentially break older poky/newer oe combinations.

Nevertheless, this is a non-issue for me now and the patch can be discarded.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 612 bytes --]

Re: [oe] [meta-python][dunfell][PATCH] python3-fasteners: Revert new override syntax

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:19 PM Clemens Terasa via
lists.openembedded.org
<clemens.terasa=garz-fricke.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
> You are total right, my bad.
>
> I checked out the poky dunfell-23.0.11 tag, however, the BBSERVER was still running in the background and thus using the old bitbake.
>
> But shouldn't meta-openembedded be as compatible as possible? I am sure this habe been discussed dozens of times and I am ignorantly not researching enough.
> At least in this case I do not see a compelling cause to use the new override style, that might potentially break older poky/newer oe combinations.
>

meta-openembedded does not get tagged for point releases, so its left
upto end users to integrate it with a given point release, however
maintainers always make sure
that latest release branch work with latest core branch tip.

> Nevertheless, this is a non-issue for me now and the patch can be discarded.
>
>
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#95920): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/95920
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89666632/1997914
> Group Owner: openembedded-devel+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>