All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: uImage load address rework
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:31:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3243557.sP7VV5jPVm@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoSoWesMgBmbfUKxeyfwWcKZ77MyckCdPpKwK4WxYynWbA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Magnus,

On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:21:34 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 10 June 2013 18:28:57 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> 
> >> This is V2 of the mach-shmobile uImage load address rework patch.
> >> 
> >> Rework the mach-shmobile uImage load address calculation by storing
> >> the per-board load addresses in Makefile.boot. This removes the
> >> CONFIG_MEMORY_START dependency from Makefile.boot, and it also makes
> >> it possible to create safe kernel images that boot on multiple boards.
> >> 
> >> This is one of several series of code that reworks code not to rely on
> >> CONFIG_MEMORY_START/SIZE which in turn is needed for ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> > 
> > I've noticed today that KZM9G doesn't boot v3.10-rc2 with
> > CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR=y. While not caused by this patch, that's something
> > that will need to be fixed to support multi-arch kernels. I'm not too
> > familiar with early boot code, would you be able to have a look at this ?
> 
> I will have a look. I suspect that issue is not related to this patch, is
> it?

No, it isn't, the issue is present in v3.10-rc2. I don't know if it has ever 
worked.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: uImage load address rework
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 04:31:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3243557.sP7VV5jPVm@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoSoWesMgBmbfUKxeyfwWcKZ77MyckCdPpKwK4WxYynWbA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Magnus,

On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:21:34 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 10 June 2013 18:28:57 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> 
> >> This is V2 of the mach-shmobile uImage load address rework patch.
> >> 
> >> Rework the mach-shmobile uImage load address calculation by storing
> >> the per-board load addresses in Makefile.boot. This removes the
> >> CONFIG_MEMORY_START dependency from Makefile.boot, and it also makes
> >> it possible to create safe kernel images that boot on multiple boards.
> >> 
> >> This is one of several series of code that reworks code not to rely on
> >> CONFIG_MEMORY_START/SIZE which in turn is needed for ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> > 
> > I've noticed today that KZM9G doesn't boot v3.10-rc2 with
> > CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR=y. While not caused by this patch, that's something
> > that will need to be fixed to support multi-arch kernels. I'm not too
> > familiar with early boot code, would you be able to have a look at this ?
> 
> I will have a look. I suspect that issue is not related to this patch, is
> it?

No, it isn't, the issue is present in v3.10-rc2. I don't know if it has ever 
worked.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-12  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10  9:28 [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: uImage load address rework Magnus Damm
2013-06-10  9:28 ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-11  7:47 ` Simon Horman
2013-06-11  7:47   ` Simon Horman
2013-06-11  9:33   ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-11  9:33     ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-11 13:54 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-06-11 13:54   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-06-12  2:20   ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-12  2:20     ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-12  6:22     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-06-12  6:22       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-06-11 21:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-11 21:50   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-12  2:21   ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-12  2:21     ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-12  2:31     ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-06-12  2:31       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-19 13:16       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-19 13:16         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-25 14:00         ` Magnus Damm
2013-06-25 14:00           ` Magnus Damm
2013-07-03 23:53           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-03 23:53             ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3243557.sP7VV5jPVm@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.