From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mturquette@baylibre.com,
christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com,
zhangqing@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: convert rk3036 pll type to use internal lock status
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:26:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3308363.gZKxoYc2QA@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114050518.D3C40222C3@mail.kernel.org>
Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020, 06:05:18 CET schrieb Stephen Boyd:
> Quoting Heiko Stuebner (2020-01-13 07:26:56)
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > index 198417d56300..37378ded0993 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > @@ -118,12 +118,30 @@ static int rockchip_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 6
> > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS BIT(10)
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_MASK 0x1
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_SHIFT 12
> > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN BIT(13)
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0
> >
> > -#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN (1 << 13)
> > +static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
> > +{
> > + u32 pllcon;
> > + int delay = 24000000;
> > +
> > + /* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */
> > + while (delay > 0) {
> > + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1));
> > + if (pllcon & RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + delay--;
>
> There isn't any udelay here. So the timeout is just as fast as the CPU
> can churn through this? Why not use an actual time? Or use the
> readl_poll_timeout() APIs?
Done in
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200128100204.1318450-3-heiko@sntech.de
and to keep things similar, I did a conversion to iopoll helpers for the
other variants too.
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, zhangqing@rock-chips.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: convert rk3036 pll type to use internal lock status
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:26:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3308363.gZKxoYc2QA@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114050518.D3C40222C3@mail.kernel.org>
Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020, 06:05:18 CET schrieb Stephen Boyd:
> Quoting Heiko Stuebner (2020-01-13 07:26:56)
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > index 198417d56300..37378ded0993 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> > @@ -118,12 +118,30 @@ static int rockchip_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 6
> > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS BIT(10)
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_MASK 0x1
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_SHIFT 12
> > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN BIT(13)
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff
> > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0
> >
> > -#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN (1 << 13)
> > +static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
> > +{
> > + u32 pllcon;
> > + int delay = 24000000;
> > +
> > + /* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */
> > + while (delay > 0) {
> > + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1));
> > + if (pllcon & RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + delay--;
>
> There isn't any udelay here. So the timeout is just as fast as the CPU
> can churn through this? Why not use an actual time? Or use the
> readl_poll_timeout() APIs?
Done in
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200128100204.1318450-3-heiko@sntech.de
and to keep things similar, I did a conversion to iopoll helpers for the
other variants too.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-28 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-13 15:26 [PATCH] clk: rockchip: convert rk3036 pll type to use internal lock status Heiko Stuebner
2020-01-13 15:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
2020-01-13 15:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
2020-01-14 5:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-14 5:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-14 5:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-28 10:26 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2020-01-28 10:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3308363.gZKxoYc2QA@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.