Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: Add power-domain header for RK3576 SoCs

[Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>]

On Sunday, 4 August 2024 05:56:39 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/08/2024 17:14, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>
> > 
> > Define power domain IDs as described in the TRM.
> 
> Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
> example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
> your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
> explained here:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patche
> s.html#i-for-patch-submitters
> > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>
> > [reword]
> > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h
> 
> This is part of bindings.
> 
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h
> > b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h
> Missing vendor prefix. This should be named after compatible.

Looks like all other rockchip power bindings use the include/dt-bindings/
power/rkXXXX.h format. Should I keep that way ?

> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..cb33a32c1aed9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
> 
> Weird license.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof