All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: "Pedersen, Thomas" <twp@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	"Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org"
	<openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ath10k mesh + ap + encryption?
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:16:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3338244.IC8yTOzn2x@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474669037.16013.9.camel@qca.qualcomm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1609 bytes --]

On Friday, September 23, 2016 10:18:49 PM CEST Pedersen, Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 08:43 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 5:54:38 PM CEST Pedersen, Thomas wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 14:30 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the clarification. We will then stick to the 70's branch
> > > > then.
> > > > 
> > > > Does anyone have pointers for the other questions? :) I would believe
> > > > hat many 
> > > > people would be interested in running AP + Mesh encrypted at the same
> > > > time (at 
> > > > least in the open source community ...).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > We're testing encrypted AP + Mesh quite successfully right now with
> > > this firmware: https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-firmware/commit/307cb46b
> > > 06661ebd3186723b5002de769c7add83, of course that is for a QCA4019 chip.
> > > Which chip are you using? I can poke the firmware guys for possibility
> > > of getting a 10.4.3.2 firmware build for it.
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > thanks for the hint! We are using an older QCA9882. I assume your firmware
> > will 
 not work for this one? If you can poke the firmware guys, that
> > would be great.> 
> > :)
> 
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> According to firmware guys the latest code can actually compile down to
> any chipset, so it should simply be a matter of getting builds released.

Hi Thomas,

thats great news, thanks for the heads up!

How are we going to get those builds released? Who can I ask, or do you want 
to take care of that?

Thanks,
     Simon

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 146 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: "Pedersen, Thomas" <twp@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	"openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org"
	<openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath10k mesh + ap + encryption?
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:16:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3338244.IC8yTOzn2x@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474669037.16013.9.camel@qca.qualcomm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1609 bytes --]

On Friday, September 23, 2016 10:18:49 PM CEST Pedersen, Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 08:43 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 5:54:38 PM CEST Pedersen, Thomas wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 14:30 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the clarification. We will then stick to the 70's branch
> > > > then.
> > > > 
> > > > Does anyone have pointers for the other questions? :) I would believe
> > > > hat many 
> > > > people would be interested in running AP + Mesh encrypted at the same
> > > > time (at 
> > > > least in the open source community ...).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > We're testing encrypted AP + Mesh quite successfully right now with
> > > this firmware: https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-firmware/commit/307cb46b
> > > 06661ebd3186723b5002de769c7add83, of course that is for a QCA4019 chip.
> > > Which chip are you using? I can poke the firmware guys for possibility
> > > of getting a 10.4.3.2 firmware build for it.
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > thanks for the hint! We are using an older QCA9882. I assume your firmware
> > will 
 not work for this one? If you can poke the firmware guys, that
> > would be great.> 
> > :)
> 
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> According to firmware guys the latest code can actually compile down to
> any chipset, so it should simply be a matter of getting builds released.

Hi Thomas,

thats great news, thanks for the heads up!

How are we going to get those builds released? Who can I ask, or do you want 
to take care of that?

Thanks,
     Simon

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-25 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-13  8:00 ath10k mesh + ap + encryption? Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13  8:00 ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 10:59 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-13 10:59   ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-13 11:13   ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 11:13     ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 11:25     ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-13 11:25       ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-13 11:38       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2016-09-13 11:38         ` Sebastian Gottschall
2016-09-13 12:30       ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 12:30         ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 17:54         ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-13 17:54           ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-19  6:43           ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-19  6:43             ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-19  9:34             ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Sven Eckelmann
2016-09-19  9:34               ` Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-24 16:41               ` Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-24 16:41                 ` Sven Eckelmann
2016-09-23 22:18             ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-23 22:18               ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-25 20:16               ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
2016-09-25 20:16                 ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 18:54     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2016-09-13 18:54       ` Martin Blumenstingl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3338244.IC8yTOzn2x@prime \
    --to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
    --cc=twp@qca.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.