From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sunsite.dk>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjanv@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 15:22:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3484.994083776@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3bsn7gftr.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch>
In-Reply-To: <d3bsn7gftr.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> <3652.993803483@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
jes@sunsite.dk said:
> But it's going to cost for the ones who do not support this.
You don't need to make it out-of-line for all cases - or indeed in any case
where it isn't out-of-line already. Some architectures may have only IO
calls out-of-line (many already do). Some may have MMIO calls out-of-line
too - some already do that too.
It would just be nice to have a standard way of doing it, and in particular
it would be nice to pass the struct resource into the out-of-line functions
in the case where they _are_ out of line, so that the Iyou/O functions don't
have to play evil tricks with the numbers they're given to work out which bus
the caller wanted to talk to.
#ifdef OUT_OF_LINE_MMIO
#define res_readb(res, adr) (res->access_ops->readb(res, adr)
#else
#define res_readb(res, adr) readb(adr)
#endif
etc.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-02 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-28 13:13 [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions David Howells
2001-06-28 13:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-28 13:55 ` David Woodhouse
2001-06-28 16:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-06-29 8:31 ` David Howells
2001-06-29 21:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-07-02 14:22 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2001-07-02 15:57 ` David Howells
2001-07-02 16:17 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 16:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 16:41 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 16:56 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 18:22 ` Russell King
2001-07-02 18:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-02 20:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 22:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-02 22:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 23:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03 12:02 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-03 14:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03 2:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 8:38 ` David Howells
2001-07-07 11:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-07-03 8:15 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 8:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 8:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 9:00 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 9:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-02 22:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03 8:04 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 7:55 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 8:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 8:07 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 11:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-07 11:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] <20010702191129.A29246@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-07-03 8:12 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3484.994083776@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jes@sunsite.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.