From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sunsite.dk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
dhowells@redhat.com (David Howells),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjanv@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions
Date: 28 Jun 2001 18:02:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3bsn8bnj8.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15FbuU-0006wH-00@the-village.bc.nu> <7040.993736538@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: David Woodhouse's message of "Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:55:38 +0100"
>>>>> "David" == David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:
David> Having per-resource I/O methods would help us to remove some of
David> the cruft which is accumulating in various non-x86 code. Note
David> that the below is the _core_ routines for _one_ board - I'm not
David> even including the extra indirection through the machine vector
David> here....
Have you considered the method used by the 8390 Ethernet driver?
For each device, add a pointer to the registers and a register shift.
I really don't like hacing virtual access functions that makes memory
mapped I/O look the same as I/O operations. For memory mapped I/O you
want to be able to smart optimizations to reduce the access on the PCI
bus (or similar).
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-28 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-28 13:13 [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions David Howells
2001-06-28 13:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-28 13:55 ` David Woodhouse
2001-06-28 16:02 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2001-06-29 8:31 ` David Howells
2001-06-29 21:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-07-02 14:22 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 15:57 ` David Howells
2001-07-02 16:17 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 16:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 16:41 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-02 16:56 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 18:22 ` Russell King
2001-07-02 18:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-02 20:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 22:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-02 22:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02 23:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03 12:02 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-03 14:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03 2:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 8:38 ` David Howells
2001-07-07 11:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-07-03 8:15 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 8:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 8:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 9:00 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 9:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-02 22:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-07-03 8:04 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 7:55 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 8:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-03 8:07 ` David Howells
2001-07-03 11:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-07 11:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] <20010702191129.A29246@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-07-03 8:12 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3bsn8bnj8.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch \
--to=jes@sunsite.dk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.